You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
Eh, as with many third party candidates you think they are pretty great at first then you read into their platforms and its so full of red flags and dealbreakers that you turn around and go back to voting for trump.
Open borders - no fucking thanks.
Likes iran nuclear deal - nope
Wants government funded political campaigns - useless
She's a nutty goof ball. I probably wouldn't vote for her or anyone in the Green party. That said she's likable and entertaining so she's more palatable than Hillary at first glance.
Equating the energy source with the lowest death/kwh with the most dangerous weapons ever created, demonstrates at best willful ignorance. In a world where climate change is becoming more and more obvious, where a solar backbone has been elusive for over 50 years, hamstringing the real options we may one day need is recklessly irresponsible. Her ignorance could be cured in a mere hour consultation with legitimate experts.
She is pro every 'nice' and 'moral' thing.... Which is utter cluster fuck insanity if one considers the reality.
A public office like president of a major nation is living with trade offs from sunup till sundown. And most of the time none of the choices are nice or even remotely moral, they are trying to rationalize the best choice from a horrible cluster fuck of humanity and its consequences. Her need to stand on top of a moral soapbox is either just pandering, or dangerous niativity.
[+]OneNation0 points0 points0 points
ago
(edited ago)
[–]OneNation0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
She's good at tweeting, but substantive policy is not her strong suit. However, during this election, that doesn't kick her out of the realm of possibility. She's just a little off her rocker. First with the anti-vax stuff, then the wifi will kill you stuff, and now with the poor Harambe. She has Miss Havisham tendencies.
Used to like her due the fact that she has similarities to Bernie Sanders but isn't afraid to diss Shillary, then I realized that she's anti-science. Pretty big red flag to me.
Actually no, I did research and found out anti-vaxx, is the party's old platform, and Trump/Clinton/Johnson voters are pushing it as if it's their current platform. The only mention of vaccines on their website is support of developing an AIDS vaccine.
As for homeopathy, the Green party still believes in that, but Stein herself does not. Trump/Clinton/Johnson voters push that as if she personally believes it.
[–]FuckReddit-0 points
1 point
1 point
(+1|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
Honestly the way i see it is trump is chaos, hillary is hilarious so i only have her to vote for, she is the only one that at least isnt nuts. She has my vote only because my boy bernie is out.
Sort: Top
[–] Dumb_Comment_Bot 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago
Eh, as with many third party candidates you think they are pretty great at first then you read into their platforms and its so full of red flags and dealbreakers that you turn around and go back to voting for trump.
Open borders - no fucking thanks.
Likes iran nuclear deal - nope
Wants government funded political campaigns - useless
Pro gun control - fuck off old bitch
Accepting Syrian refugees - eat a dick
Pro blm - nope nope nope
[–] Ywis 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
She's a nutty goof ball. I probably wouldn't vote for her or anyone in the Green party. That said she's likable and entertaining so she's more palatable than Hillary at first glance.
[–] hunter3 [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
what makes her a nutty goof ball?
[–] Ywis ago
I don't know about her specifically. The green party are always nutty hippies.
[–] gbiota1 ago
Equating the energy source with the lowest death/kwh with the most dangerous weapons ever created, demonstrates at best willful ignorance. In a world where climate change is becoming more and more obvious, where a solar backbone has been elusive for over 50 years, hamstringing the real options we may one day need is recklessly irresponsible. Her ignorance could be cured in a mere hour consultation with legitimate experts.
[–] AutisticInTech 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago (edited ago)
She is pro every 'nice' and 'moral' thing.... Which is utter cluster fuck insanity if one considers the reality.
A public office like president of a major nation is living with trade offs from sunup till sundown. And most of the time none of the choices are nice or even remotely moral, they are trying to rationalize the best choice from a horrible cluster fuck of humanity and its consequences. Her need to stand on top of a moral soapbox is either just pandering, or dangerous niativity.
[–] MetalAegis 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
As other people have stated, she is pro gun control, pro mass immigration, pro open boarders and pro BLM.
Maybe not a globalist puppet, but certainly a useful liberal fool.
[–] OneNation 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
She's run for public office often, but never been elected, right? this is why people don't vote for her
[–] hunter3 [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
because she doesnt believe in zoos (at least for primates)?
[–] OneNation ago (edited ago)
She's good at tweeting, but substantive policy is not her strong suit. However, during this election, that doesn't kick her out of the realm of possibility. She's just a little off her rocker. First with the anti-vax stuff, then the wifi will kill you stuff, and now with the poor Harambe. She has Miss Havisham tendencies.
[–] TheKFCNyanCat 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Used to like her due the fact that she has similarities to Bernie Sanders but isn't afraid to diss Shillary, then I realized that she's anti-science. Pretty big red flag to me.
[–] hunter3 [S] ago
could you give me some reasons or links to why you think shes anti science?
[–] 6209207? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/danthropology/2016/08/denouncing-anti-science-how-jill-stein-lost-my-vote-for-good/
Probably stuff like this.
[–] TheKFCNyanCat ago
Actually no, I did research and found out anti-vaxx, is the party's old platform, and Trump/Clinton/Johnson voters are pushing it as if it's their current platform. The only mention of vaccines on their website is support of developing an AIDS vaccine.
As for homeopathy, the Green party still believes in that, but Stein herself does not. Trump/Clinton/Johnson voters push that as if she personally believes it.
Basically, I believed anti-Green voters too much.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
[–] hunter3 [S] ago
what makes her nuts?
[–] FuckReddit- 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Honestly the way i see it is trump is chaos, hillary is hilarious so i only have her to vote for, she is the only one that at least isnt nuts. She has my vote only because my boy bernie is out.
[–] hunter3 [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
does the corruption bother you?
[–] hunter3 [S] ago
do you think jill and gary are nuts?