0
2

[–] scandalous-goat 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Are you paid for these posts?

0
0

[–] Mick 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

It's more about controlling content delivery. Say I'm an ISP and also offer a streaming service, I might be inclined to speed throttle a competitors streaming service in favor of my own. Net neutrality would prevent that type of thing from happening, hopefully.

0
0

[–] 5854050 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

It's about them having the power to choose winners and losers on the internet, not so much blocking, but throttling and doing other data manipulation.

0
0

[–] Jasoman 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

From what I believe. ISPs would like to charge Companies like Netfix more money for faster connection to users. Net Neutrality is to make sure there are no Paid fast lanes. IF there where paid fast lanes small sites could have a hard time loading because some other connections are getting priority. So ISPs could "block"/slow down sites because they are not paying for a fast lane. Please correct me if I am wrong.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

1
-1

[–] hellowe [S] 1 points -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

so what would happen to the website i run?