0
0

[–] VIP740 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

You work with the consistency that's available. Let's look at a number sequence: 1, 4, 11, 16, 23, 24, 33

I doubt you'll find a significant pattern emerging, as a stochastic process was used to generate the sequence. But you'll notice each number is larger than the last one, that part's consistent. So even though you can't tell what the next number will be, it's a safe bet that it will be no smaller than the previous number (nothing's 100% guaranteed). Even if the information you receive is totally random you can use science to show there is no simple pattern or process generating the information (you can't prove something is truly random though).

0
0

[–] HST 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Is english your second language, or do you not know how to ask a question?

0
0

[–] killer7 [S] 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

English is my 2nd language.

0
0

[–] HST 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) ago 

Gotchya. You did fine then.