You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
1

[–] Kael_thas_Sunstrider 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

If you want me to comment on that article, you could link it, because there is no way I can be sure I got the same version without you sourcing it.

Also I am not familiar with the theorem, or maybe I do know it, but do not know the one who taught of it. Anyway, I quickly read the opening part of wikipedia on the subject, and I am not the correct man to explain you the inner workings of gravity; This is because I am not knowledgeable enough in the particles physics field. If there would be a quantum gravity that was connectible to the macroscopic particles / Einstein's relativistic mechanics, I would be a bit more knowledgeable on the subject.

For your preservation of momentum / energy, there is no clear explanation why it does this, it just does. The clearest explanation is preservation of energy and momentum. Probably there are some fields that hold this together.

0
0

[–] 9311654? [S] ago 

he wikipedia article is Le Sage's theory of gravitation. The link is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Sage%27s_theory_of_gravitation. My original question was if gravitions are responsible for the gravitational force in the same way that other particles are responsible for the other three forces ( strong, weak, and electromagnetic), how does that work? Le Sage's theory deals with that by proposing that gravitons bump into things and transfer their energy/ momentum to those other objects. But the wikipedia article doesn't explain this idea in any way I can understand, for reasons given in my previous post.

0
0

[–] Kael_thas_Sunstrider ago 

That would probably not work, because gravity works over the distance of lightyears. But that is not my area of expertise. I know weak and strong work on small distances because of Heisenberg.