0
7

[–] TattedGuyser 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

I moved away from r/AskMen because of the vast majority of feminine replies. If I ask a question I want to hear the replies of MEN, not women and I want to give replies as a man and not have the tone police breathing down my neck. The place became a lost cause so I left. I'm hoping here will turn out a lot better and the mods won't allow a feminine take over.

0
1

[–] Zednix 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I want to give replies as a man and not have the tone police breathing down my neck.

That is why I never posted in askwomen. You would get shit on so hard by the PC police just for giving an honest response.

0
5

[–] RedSocks157 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

We discussed this when the sub was just taking off, and I can tell you that I agree with you. I'm not sure what concrete measures we can take, but I'll look into it. So far, we seem to have a lot of men answering questions which is awesome!

0
3

[–] ConquistadorCoronado 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Can we have a "Men Only" tag? Only people with male flairs can answer.

0
2

[–] RedSocks157 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

That might be a good idea. I'll talk it over with CC and we'll see once we get the CSS and everything figured out.

1
3

[–] cygnus_x 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago  (edited ago)

I think if you only want male responses, you should clarify that in your posts. Then, you can be far more strick on the rules. I'm personally often pleasantly surprised by responses from the ladies that frequent the sub.

1
3

[–] ClitoralCommander 1 points 3 points (+4|-1) ago  (edited ago)

We are planning on implementing flairs on the subverse for men and women. I'm not sure if the CSS can be easily made so that you can sort by male responses or female responses, but that could be a good way to filter the responses.

However, we currently do not have the "women are welcome but be respectful" rule right now. I was hoping on not having to prevent anyone from giving their opinions. Perhaps later, we will have a community vote on the rules so that everyone can give their opinions on how this community should develop.

0
2

[–] Mr_Lovette 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I'd be curious what the group thinks about it be strictly men only responses to questions. I mean, it is AskMen. There's a AskWomen if you want a woman's approach on the question after all.

0
1

[–] ConquistadorCoronado 0 points 1 points (+1|-0) ago 

I'd rather you just decided the rules right away.

0
3

[–] Groomzilla 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

It's a fair trade.

Askwomen is populated by mostly fedora fags.

0
4

[–] 977740? [S] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Askmen is Fedora's also.

1-2 years ago it used to be a great place for honest brutal answers, now its a hugbox.

An example of my last submission in which I has concerns over continuing with my current gf due to her age.

https://archive.is/Cs9yH

0
4

[–] RedSocks157 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

The last time I posted in there, I was the subject of a big downvote brigade because I said I wanted to marry a woman who would take my last name after marriage. It was really pussified towards the end.

0
2

[–] ConquistadorCoronado 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

That bugged me about askmen too. Especially when it came to relationship questions. I want opinions from men because what women want and what they are receptive too are rarely the same.

0
2

[–] MGTOW_Xui 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The amount of women on /r/AskMen pushing their feminine agenda in each thread frustrated me to no end. And it seemed like the more women were in a thread, the more of the "white knightey" dudes would be in that thread, too.

It really follows the general trend in society of women invading and then taking over male spaces.

0
2

[–] FourNominalCents 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

r/askwomen was a sjw mess. So the reasonable women left for r/askmen. Our v/askwomen is not nearly as bad as the other one, so v/askwomen will probably serve their purposes, but time will tell.

load more comments ▼ (6 remaining)