You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
'Another morally dubious accounting practice continues to be used in EPA’s cost-benefit analyses: low-balling the value of children’s IQ points. ', "Its apparent goal is to put an industry-friendly thumb on the EPA's cost-benefit analysis scale by prioritizing profits ahead of the public interest and by selling short regulatory benefits."
'A little-noticed move by the Trump/Wheeler Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) suggests we may see more cooking of the books to justify going easier on polluters. '
'Even when attempted in good faith, cost-benefit analysis is a poor fit for environmental and public health safeguards. '
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 13542748? ago
https://archive.fo/8c1D6 :
'Another morally dubious accounting practice continues to be used in EPA’s cost-benefit analyses: low-balling the value of children’s IQ points. ', "Its apparent goal is to put an industry-friendly thumb on the EPA's cost-benefit analysis scale by prioritizing profits ahead of the public interest and by selling short regulatory benefits."
'A little-noticed move by the Trump/Wheeler Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) suggests we may see more cooking of the books to justify going easier on polluters. '
'Even when attempted in good faith, cost-benefit analysis is a poor fit for environmental and public health safeguards. '
' Both are experts in cost-benefit analysis. '
This has been an automated message.