You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 19539554? ago 

Well done.

and all those organizations were to have a role in the state.

0
0

[–] 19546728? ago 

To further clarify: by including all private bodies within the state and providing them a role, they would then begin to work with the state as opposed to against it. It essentially eliminates the problem of 'lobbying' which is the true scourge that has undermined British and American 'democracy'. The businesses in those nations have no stake or loyalty, and in general they are better able to achieve profits when they have the entire planet as their market as opposed to a single nation; this might mean the people in their nation end up unemployed, having their wages undercut, or even seeing the establishment of sweatshops and slave labour camps; but what does that matter to the trans-nationalist businessman?

Note also that it is not just the businessmen involved, but representatives from every level of society. It is essentially the British constitutional monarchy with representation for the Lord's, Commons and Monarch; just evolved from its feudal roots and without the potential for corruption. The British Constitutional Monarchy was supposed to ensure that all levels of society were included in the rule of the nation to ensure that neither a plebian led communist state could form, nor a tyrannical dictatorship, nor an inhuman mercantilist corporatacracy. It didn't work in Britain because of corruption, and now the Lord's are Lords, the Commons are Lords, the Monarch is no longer allowed to have an opinion and everyone is bankrolled by international businesses that care nothing for the nation and have no investment outside of being able to milk the populace.

Tldr: Fascism is just a more specific and less corruptible version of Constitutional Monarchy with the roles renamed and expanded upon.