You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 19509583? ago 

Honestly, if you wanted to do something, causing the state to overexpose themselves at the pain of the public is the best way. All of their control structures are in place and theyre now directly connected to individual departments throughout the US via fed grants. They will have monolithic response to any threat against state power, because state power is their power. I think one of the best ways to cause exposure is to force the state to over-protect jews. Jews get the most direct representation through state function and its coming out through things like BDS laws in FL. The problem is, most Floridians could care less. The jews always add modifying language to their laws too, like "Such and Such-Antisemitic-speech-law-and all other minorities". Of course the law isn't for others, its for them. But theyre so overconfident that the goyim dont know, they push their laws anyways. If you could get the state to wantonly cater to jewish neuroticism, it would deeply expose them, not only to the "right" but the "left" as well. Of course the jews plan to do this anyways, but over a long timespan. Probably like 50 to 100 years. You ideally want to get the monolith to go full kosher PRIOR to initial resistance, that way, any militant resistance becomes aware of the reality, not wasting their lives on proxies, and the left is forced to catharsis of how their supposed mantra is "equality" yet there is an elite minority that is far-beyond priviledged. Do it too slow, and they will just adjust, you have to cause it fast, that way the changes are abrupt and it forces social reckoning and dissonance.

0
0

[–] 19618415? ago 

If you could get the state to wantonly cater to jewish neuroticism, it would deeply expose them

i disagree. not too long ago a jew became a state senator in a red county in the red state of TN. this is a farming region with virtually 0 kikes. the first thing he did in office was pass the TN anti-semitism bill which protected synagogues etc.

no one noticed. no one woke up. and they got their protection.

a better strategy is to attack that which is indefensible in the eyes of your state, and this forces the state to defend the target. this exposes the true character of the state. so go after abortion clinics, opioid manufacturers, refugee resettlement centers etc. (these would be red state targets of course)

0
0

[–] 19526659? ago 

>>13455008

force the state to over-protect jews

0
0

[–] 19510168? ago 

0
0

[–] 19546107? ago 

Thanks. Made my night.

I live with a boomer on and relate to the inability to rouse them. I think the only solution will come when they suffer and involuntarily take action. They'll hate it.

0
0

[–] 19509594? ago