You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 19384856? ago 

If a picture is truly worth 1000 words, then motion pictures are more effective means of data transfer than text alone.

Many motion pictures run at least 29 frames per second. That's 29 pictures per second. So in one second the viewer observes 29,000 words. Most adult books are 100,000 words total. The bible has a little under 200,000 words total. This quantity of words is far surpassed by motion pictures. In a mere minute motion pictures transmit 1,740,000 words.

Many motion pictures run for a little more than an hour, but let's just say it goes for one hour exactly, this would equate to 104,400,000 words.

but not all these words are being absorbed with 100% efficiency

True. Consider this: no single message is transmitted with 100% efficiency from sender to receiver. The signal to noise ratio is no less comparable to any conversation between anons. The message can actually be more effectively transmitted by motion picture because of visual emotional anchoring so it can be argued that it is even more efficient than reading straight text.

Programming and rewarding thoughts at 1000 words per second opens the flood gates of possibility.

Only fools would discard this technology.

Politicians should want to harness this powerful tool by its very nature.

LONG LIVE THE NEW FLESH

Reddit spacing.

etc.

0
0

[–] 19429165? ago 

Many motion pictures run at least 29 frames per second

Not very many

0
0

[–] 19384859? ago 

Funny thing is that James Woods in Videodrome was wrong. The plan to release the show with the signal creating tumors and hallucinations in degenerates would have worked