You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 19345767? ago 

Iran probably did attack the tankers. Consider:

  1. Drone footage. Grainy, black-and-white. Done footage just looks like, they’re using very high power zooms at night.

  2. Coming alongside underway big ships like tankers does take a lot of skill, something Iranians are considered the most trained at and in-line with their asymmetric warfare tactics.

  3. Iran threatened several times that they will shut down exports in the Straits if they can’t export.

But why would Iran damage tankers instead of sinking them? Iran wants to show they have the capability of harming trade but don’t want to push public opinion into a war against them.

Why would Iran attack Japanese tankers when the Japanese prime minister is visiting? That’s a good question which could point towards a false-flag motive…but, what would it matter to anyone false-flagging Japan? It could also just be by chance, there is a lot of traffic going through the straits.

But the crew of one ship saw a flying object. Okay, that could be a missile. There’s nothing at all which says Iran wasn’t also using small missile weapons in the attack.

0
0

[–] 19354674? ago 

our 'mine' story fell apart when the damage was 4 foot above the waterline

<please goy, believe that iran ALSO used missles

0
0

[–] 19354659? ago 

Iran probably did attack the tankers

No.

Iran is keeping it's nose pretty damn clean right now. It hadn't attacked anyone, and Japan knows it, and the Netherlands knows it, and most of the rest of the world knows it. Iran had every reason to maintain good relations, and no reason to cause a fuss.

0
0

[–] 19354660? ago 

The only faggots pushing for war are faggots.