You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 19228106? ago 

Agreed. Nationalists and communists demonstrated throughout the 20th century that governments can be crippled by simply bypassing them and going straight to the people.

This is still apparent today. Right Wing politicians and centrist movements that went around talking to the actual people about what to do and what to avoid doing got the upper hand. Doesn't matter if said people are part of the (((establishment))) or not, if a law exists and people ignore it it may as well just be a piece of useless scrap paper, look at Hungary and how its people treat foreign invaders. They fenced themselves IN so that their open border would still count as Hungarian soil and the migrants free.

The Austro-Hungarian Empire was not defeated in WW1 by the Entente. They were defeated from within because millions of their subjects withdrew their consent to be governed.

Surely foreign intervention and (((agitators))) helped tremendously, but it's just as you said, it's not like the Empire was finger snap'd out of existence, people just gradually decided that the institution (as it's just a social construct) was meaningless and powerless.

That is the key to revolutionary warfare or 4th Generation Warfare.

Precisely, but you should sell it to people as Asymmetric Warfare, as it's a much more correct way of putting it - waging a war that isn't concerned with just military operations as much as trying to destroy the core principles of the enemy by any means possible, including information, economy and culture. There's a reason why such a gigantic paper tiger such as China is currently winning it, and there's a reason why the INSTANT they faced even the slightest hint of an offense - the Hong Kong rebellion of the last few days - they retreated in fear. They know that if they roll the tanks, their whole operation of subversion of the West is done fore, the media will have a field day with them and no one will buy their goods anymore or support their causes, if they simply sit idly and let the Hong Kong populace to do as they please, they're fucked either way as it shows their weakness. The mother of all catch-22s.

Military defeat comes after ideological defeat and the enemy must always be the (((government))) not the people.

Right on the money again. Very telling also of the fact that military defeat before ideological defeat only strengthens ideologues. Look at the Third Reich or Imperial Japan and compare them to the Eastern Bloc or Fascist Italy. The ideals of the former two never disappeared, the latter's faded away after they both proved inefficient, discredited or its main leaders got the noose - also look at how Communism in Japan is basically nonexistent.

If /pol/ or anyone for that matter really wishes to win decisive victories, they need to realize that public opinion (NOT PR) is what determines the final victor. It's not enough to paint the enemy as disgusting, people feeling personally attacked by it will lead to its downfall.

0
0

[–] 19234132? ago 

It's not enough to paint the enemy as disgusting, people feeling personally attacked by it will lead to its downfall.

This is a key concept here.

You'd think that explaining to people that their race is on the verge of extinction would be enough to convince people of the need for revolution. After all, that is by definition being attacked. But sadly American individualism has made it difficult for individual Americans (Whites) to recognize that an attack upon our race is an attack upon our person. Or maybe racial extinction is simply too abstract and "far off" a concept for people to understand. Or maybe we're just bad at explaining it.

It is for this reason that I unironically wish that the Regime here in America would try to collect reparations money for the niggers. If Americans cannot comprehend a threat to their racial existence, then maybe they'll understand a threat to their economic existence.

Maybe an extra 5,000 dollars in taxes and the threat of impending impoverishment will be enough of a kick in the teeth to incite rebellion.

Also

you should sell it to people as Asymmetric Warfare

Are you the Asymmetric Warfare anon?

0
0

[–] 19234145? ago 

Or maybe racial extinction is simply too abstract and "far off" a concept for people to understand.

Precisely. Preaching to people that "the Chinese are polluting our limited resources on our only planet" and showing them a bunch of sad pictures of wildlife being contaminated will at best rise some "huh, good thing I'm not in South-East Asia" kind of comments. You need to shock people into action if you want them behind your cause, that's why any time money troubles or sport shit come up, you're certain to see hordes of ordinary citizens turned into violent, protesting thugs. The things I've heard old grannies shout and do outside sports events would make a sailor blush.

And to this, I really need to give a big round of applause to (((our greatest allies))) and the American press of the wartime. I don't think they could've made more gruesome, grotesque monsters out of their enemies and made their presence feel so ubiquitous than what they used to do back in the 40's. There used to be a couple of books on this subject, namely how the only way to truly make people feel like it's worth taking something down is to make an utter caricature of your enemy, making it look like it wasn't spawned by any human mother but by the depths of hell itself, but I forgot its title, sadly.

IMO, if you want to shock the American public to actually go against, dunno, the Chinese, you need to tell them that some PRC-backed company is going to buy up a sizeable chunk of American Firearm manufacturers and (((Disney))) and actively destroy parts of American culture.

It is for this reason that I unironically wish that the Regime here in America would try to collect reparations money for the niggers. If Americans cannot comprehend a threat to their racial existence, then maybe they'll understand a threat to their economic existence.

900D Chess right here, it's why they try and normalize it before actually attempting it. Drive people in a frenzy with scandalous cases first.

Are you the Asymmetric Warfare anon?

No idea who you're talking about, I've merely started scratching the surface of this amazingly complex new doctrine. It feels like talking about the properties of cannonballs while being an officer under Napoleon. We're seeing this shit happen before our very eyes and even while trying to discuss about its ramifications we're feeling its devastating effects.

0
0

[–] 19228111? ago 

Its the mighty moarphine power ranger and his checkmate folder.