85 Million armed men of military age within the US
In comparison, China has the worlds largest standing military that numbers ~2.2MM
Putin has openly stated the if the citizens of the US rose against our foreign occupants in government, he would at very least finance our efforts and, at most, send troops to fight along side us.
65% of US military is still Christian/Caucasian. Even if only 1 in 5 of those men defected to the rebel side, it would yield pure devestation for the existing power structure.
Nukes are fake and gay and ridiculous as well. If .gov nuked their own people, nobody would continue fighting for them.
More and more people are becoming aware of the true enemy and more and more would fight to eject the invaders. Nobody likes them as evidenced by a push to silence us. The very first amendment to the constitution and they are risk openly exposing theselves by going after it. That should be very telling.
Everywhere I look, I see people openly naming the jew.
An uprising would all but guarantee Russia and China to be the worlds new superpowers, they would want nothing to do with defending the jew. We would have to worry about Australia, England and African mercenaries but would have Russia and China to join our ranks and supply us if any state outside the US joined the effort.
There's no way to lose other than not doing anything. We really should be making demands at this point.
OP - https://8ch.net/pol/res/13401494.html
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 19226262? ago
Pretty much this. The (((Allies))) hated each other's guts, but they put aside their ideological, cultural and racial differences just to win the war by expending their most singular valuable skill (USSR had the manpower and terrain, the British the spy network and air superiority, the Americans the economy and industrial capacity). Meanwhile, despite having pretty much the upper hand all throughout the war, the Axis kept squabbling by trying to one-up each other, starting with this retarded notion that somehow Southern Europeans are worse than Northern Europeans (which turned a lot of Southern Europe against the ideas of fascism as a whole) and ending with the Japanese and the Germans acting independently instead of conducting what could've been a very effective offense on the Soviet Union.
Bottom line is, if you're unwilling to find suitable allies, play your strengths rather than trying to be the best at everything, act too broadly with regards to your goals and overall give the enemy press the excuse to call you a genocidal maniac by including way too many enemies all at once, then you will never be able to win. Not even with a billion men or infinite money.
Precisely. The USA, despite being the most anti-communist country of the 40's, spent every cent they could find trying to convince the West that Uncle Joe was actually a swell guy and those Ruskies actually just want the same thing they wanted.
It boggles my mind that a supposedly "redpilled" and politically wise board hosts such manners of blatant historical myopia. Can't just be a shareblue shill, at least they know they can't compete in that regards.
In fact, "allies" and "a common goal" should always be your top priorities when discussing how to get out of this terrible system the world enforced upon every country. Like allying with the Bugmen Chinks in their pursuit against the Islamization of the world, or getting the Greens and Feminists of the world to discredit the settlements in occupied Palestine.