You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 19223030? ago 

Don't make Hitler's mistakes a second time.

implying Hitler gassed 6 jews

If you begin a war acting like a genocidal imperialist, don't cry when the world unites to squash you.

implying Hitler gassed 2 jews

implying Hitler started the war

perpetuating the jewish lie that Hitler was a genocidal maniac who wanted to conquer the world and kill anyone who wasn't a blonde haired, blue eyed Aryan

implying that even if he did, that would have been a bad thing

0
0

[–] 19227174? ago 

implying Hitler gassed 6 jews

On the contrary. Had he actually killed off the 3 to 6 million kikes in Europe, the world would be a better place.

As for the rest of your post, you yourself are perpetrating the most important and crippling part of the jewish WW2 myth.

Anyway, based on your other posts you're either a shill or a moron and I have no desire to allow you to drag me into a pointless conversation where you lie and misrepresent everything I say with the intention to start pointless fights.

This is my first and last response to you. Filtered.

>>13402816

Agreed. Nationalists and communists demonstrated throughout the 20th century that governments can be crippled by simply bypassing them and going straight to the people. The Austro-Hungarian Empire was not defeated in WW1 by the Entente. They were defeated from within because millions of their subjects withdrew their consent to be governed. That is the key to revolutionary warfare or 4th Generation Warfare.

Military defeat comes after ideological defeat and the enemy must always be the (((government))) not the people.

0
0

[–] 19349715? ago 

Oh please, you can't weasel your way out now, kike. You were exposed. Eat shit fucker. Tell us more about how Hitler gassed muh 6 million and was a genocidal imperialist who started the war.

0
0

[–] 19228106? ago 

Agreed. Nationalists and communists demonstrated throughout the 20th century that governments can be crippled by simply bypassing them and going straight to the people.

This is still apparent today. Right Wing politicians and centrist movements that went around talking to the actual people about what to do and what to avoid doing got the upper hand. Doesn't matter if said people are part of the (((establishment))) or not, if a law exists and people ignore it it may as well just be a piece of useless scrap paper, look at Hungary and how its people treat foreign invaders. They fenced themselves IN so that their open border would still count as Hungarian soil and the migrants free.

The Austro-Hungarian Empire was not defeated in WW1 by the Entente. They were defeated from within because millions of their subjects withdrew their consent to be governed.

Surely foreign intervention and (((agitators))) helped tremendously, but it's just as you said, it's not like the Empire was finger snap'd out of existence, people just gradually decided that the institution (as it's just a social construct) was meaningless and powerless.

That is the key to revolutionary warfare or 4th Generation Warfare.

Precisely, but you should sell it to people as Asymmetric Warfare, as it's a much more correct way of putting it - waging a war that isn't concerned with just military operations as much as trying to destroy the core principles of the enemy by any means possible, including information, economy and culture. There's a reason why such a gigantic paper tiger such as China is currently winning it, and there's a reason why the INSTANT they faced even the slightest hint of an offense - the Hong Kong rebellion of the last few days - they retreated in fear. They know that if they roll the tanks, their whole operation of subversion of the West is done fore, the media will have a field day with them and no one will buy their goods anymore or support their causes, if they simply sit idly and let the Hong Kong populace to do as they please, they're fucked either way as it shows their weakness. The mother of all catch-22s.

Military defeat comes after ideological defeat and the enemy must always be the (((government))) not the people.

Right on the money again. Very telling also of the fact that military defeat before ideological defeat only strengthens ideologues. Look at the Third Reich or Imperial Japan and compare them to the Eastern Bloc or Fascist Italy. The ideals of the former two never disappeared, the latter's faded away after they both proved inefficient, discredited or its main leaders got the noose - also look at how Communism in Japan is basically nonexistent.

If /pol/ or anyone for that matter really wishes to win decisive victories, they need to realize that public opinion (NOT PR) is what determines the final victor. It's not enough to paint the enemy as disgusting, people feeling personally attacked by it will lead to its downfall.