85 Million armed men of military age within the US
In comparison, China has the worlds largest standing military that numbers ~2.2MM
Putin has openly stated the if the citizens of the US rose against our foreign occupants in government, he would at very least finance our efforts and, at most, send troops to fight along side us.
65% of US military is still Christian/Caucasian. Even if only 1 in 5 of those men defected to the rebel side, it would yield pure devestation for the existing power structure.
Nukes are fake and gay and ridiculous as well. If .gov nuked their own people, nobody would continue fighting for them.
More and more people are becoming aware of the true enemy and more and more would fight to eject the invaders. Nobody likes them as evidenced by a push to silence us. The very first amendment to the constitution and they are risk openly exposing theselves by going after it. That should be very telling.
Everywhere I look, I see people openly naming the jew.
An uprising would all but guarantee Russia and China to be the worlds new superpowers, they would want nothing to do with defending the jew. We would have to worry about Australia, England and African mercenaries but would have Russia and China to join our ranks and supply us if any state outside the US joined the effort.
There's no way to lose other than not doing anything. We really should be making demands at this point.
OP - https://8ch.net/pol/res/13401494.html
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 19220860? ago
This kind of retardation is exactly the kind of thing I warn National Socialists against.
Don't make Hitler's mistakes a second time.
If you begin a war acting like a genocidal imperialist, don't cry when the world unites to squash you.
I'm American but even if I were not and even if I actually wanted to exterminate every American down to the last crying child I'd never go to war against Americans. I'd go to war against their government and spend millions of dollars on propaganda to convince Americans that I was their friend coming to liberate them.
>>13401526
When any political change happens anywhere, you are guaranteed to see other states try to get involved unless they're experiencing troubles of their own. That's just a fact of politics that we're going to have to deal with.
[–] 19354785? ago
He never made it the first time. Lurk at least 2 years before posting.
[–] 19354789? ago
[–] 19349713? ago
uh oh, leftypol forgot their larp notes
[–] 19352744? ago
>>13429391
Let me guess. Your IQ is about 50?
Your ability to detect leftists is as poor as your ability to argue a point. Anyone can read what I have written and conclude that I am correct because I explained it clearly enough for anyone with a brain to understand.
Fuck off you worthless wigger.
[–] 19226262? ago
Pretty much this. The (((Allies))) hated each other's guts, but they put aside their ideological, cultural and racial differences just to win the war by expending their most singular valuable skill (USSR had the manpower and terrain, the British the spy network and air superiority, the Americans the economy and industrial capacity). Meanwhile, despite having pretty much the upper hand all throughout the war, the Axis kept squabbling by trying to one-up each other, starting with this retarded notion that somehow Southern Europeans are worse than Northern Europeans (which turned a lot of Southern Europe against the ideas of fascism as a whole) and ending with the Japanese and the Germans acting independently instead of conducting what could've been a very effective offense on the Soviet Union.
Bottom line is, if you're unwilling to find suitable allies, play your strengths rather than trying to be the best at everything, act too broadly with regards to your goals and overall give the enemy press the excuse to call you a genocidal maniac by including way too many enemies all at once, then you will never be able to win. Not even with a billion men or infinite money.
Precisely. The USA, despite being the most anti-communist country of the 40's, spent every cent they could find trying to convince the West that Uncle Joe was actually a swell guy and those Ruskies actually just want the same thing they wanted.
It boggles my mind that a supposedly "redpilled" and politically wise board hosts such manners of blatant historical myopia. Can't just be a shareblue shill, at least they know they can't compete in that regards.
In fact, "allies" and "a common goal" should always be your top priorities when discussing how to get out of this terrible system the world enforced upon every country. Like allying with the Bugmen Chinks in their pursuit against the Islamization of the world, or getting the Greens and Feminists of the world to discredit the settlements in occupied Palestine.
[–] 19223030? ago
implying Hitler gassed 2 jews
[–] 19227174? ago
On the contrary. Had he actually killed off the 3 to 6 million kikes in Europe, the world would be a better place.
As for the rest of your post, you yourself are perpetrating the most important and crippling part of the jewish WW2 myth.
Anyway, based on your other posts you're either a shill or a moron and I have no desire to allow you to drag me into a pointless conversation where you lie and misrepresent everything I say with the intention to start pointless fights.
This is my first and last response to you. Filtered.
>>13402816
Agreed. Nationalists and communists demonstrated throughout the 20th century that governments can be crippled by simply bypassing them and going straight to the people. The Austro-Hungarian Empire was not defeated in WW1 by the Entente. They were defeated from within because millions of their subjects withdrew their consent to be governed. That is the key to revolutionary warfare or 4th Generation Warfare.
Military defeat comes after ideological defeat and the enemy must always be the (((government))) not the people.