President Donald Trump said he’ll "seriously look" at banning gun silencers after last week’s mass shooting in Virginia.
“Well, I’d like to think about it," Trump said in an interview with Piers Morgan on ITV’s Good Morning Britain. “I’m going to seriously look at it."
While Trump said he didn’t "love" the idea of a ban, he also was unhappy to see the frequency and severity of mass shootings in the U.S.
Trump’s comments represent a potential crack in Republican opposition to stronger gun control measures.
They follow a shooting last week at a municipal center in Virginia Beach, Virginia, in which a gunman killed 12 people. Police recovered a high-capacity magazine and a silencer mechanism from the scene.
Virginia’s Democratic governor, Ralph Northam, said Tuesday he will summon lawmakers back to the state Capitol to consider a package of gun-control legislation. Republicans control the state’s legislature. Northam’s proposals include a ban on silencers and high-capacity magazines.
The Trump administration earlier this year banned bump stocks, devices that let a semi-automatic weapon fire like a machine gun.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 19052866? ago
Don't vote for Zionists.
Simple rules:
Any individual or organization which is not explicitly anti-Zionist is implicitly anti-White.
Any individual or organization which is not engaged in explicit White advocacy is not pro-White.
Its better to have an enemy in power whom White people can identify as an enemy, than an enemy who presents itself as an ally while bringing about the same outcomes.
[–] 19052870? ago
Roger that, thanks!
>>13365851
How did you picture me responding to this in your head?
>>13365854
Nope, since that post I've been convinced. I'm not going to mark my ballot and spend the effort to mail it in, for the white race. Actually no, I'm going to vote full democrat because accelerationism is the new meme. Any other tips?
[–] 19052876? ago
Why can't you grow some balls and just answer the fucking question: Why would you even associate, let alone vote for, somebody who is infringing on your rights and replacing you?
>>13365862
This is about him possibly banning suppressors, no one should ignore that.