President Donald Trump said he’ll "seriously look" at banning gun silencers after last week’s mass shooting in Virginia.
“Well, I’d like to think about it," Trump said in an interview with Piers Morgan on ITV’s Good Morning Britain. “I’m going to seriously look at it."
While Trump said he didn’t "love" the idea of a ban, he also was unhappy to see the frequency and severity of mass shootings in the U.S.
Trump’s comments represent a potential crack in Republican opposition to stronger gun control measures.
They follow a shooting last week at a municipal center in Virginia Beach, Virginia, in which a gunman killed 12 people. Police recovered a high-capacity magazine and a silencer mechanism from the scene.
Virginia’s Democratic governor, Ralph Northam, said Tuesday he will summon lawmakers back to the state Capitol to consider a package of gun-control legislation. Republicans control the state’s legislature. Northam’s proposals include a ban on silencers and high-capacity magazines.
The Trump administration earlier this year banned bump stocks, devices that let a semi-automatic weapon fire like a machine gun.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 19052851? ago
<Not vote for zionist props designed to trick White people into supporting their own demographic displacement.
<There are a few options to work with from there, including voting 3rd party (idealistic and forward thinking), voting democrat (accelerationist), not voting (abandon the system and don't lend any legitimacy to it), entering politics yourself (experience the crush of the kosher sandwich first-hand), etc.
<But supporting the red-team zioman who screams to White people about how they're winning while actually trying to kill them? Not top of the list.
Yeah, pretty much. Again, Trump's biggest issue is that he is a ruse - White people think he is on their side, but he clearly and explicitly is not, in objective terms. So him being in power is more harmful to White people than someone White people view as an explicit and obvious enemy being in power.
Whatever positives he might do are meaningless in the face of his negative actions, which invariably seem to target White people, the very White people who put him in power, and whom he has not supported in the least as he continues the process of their demographic displacement - and with it, the possibility of someone decent rising to power (an extreme improbability) and the possibility of Whites being able to do something about it by force if necessary (basically inevitable at some stage something will happen, but victory is in the numbers).
Now, are you going to come up with some kinda counter-narrative, or are you just gonna keep snarking away like a fucking JIDF shill running lazy damage control for the israeli's red zioman asset?
[–] 19052863? ago
I'm begging you to give me advice and tips, points of action, etc yet all you want to do is continue to go on about how bad Trump is. Can you go a full post dedicated to information about furthering the white race?
>>13365821
Did you not see where I created a guide advocating for people to own rifles and how to build one? I've made over 100 threads on /pol/ and have been called a glownigger in every single one.
>>13365828
O
K
[–] 19052867? ago
Why would you even associate, let alone vote for, somebody who is infringing on your rights and replacing you? Unless you're not white.