President Donald Trump said he’ll "seriously look" at banning gun silencers after last week’s mass shooting in Virginia.
“Well, I’d like to think about it," Trump said in an interview with Piers Morgan on ITV’s Good Morning Britain. “I’m going to seriously look at it."
While Trump said he didn’t "love" the idea of a ban, he also was unhappy to see the frequency and severity of mass shootings in the U.S.
Trump’s comments represent a potential crack in Republican opposition to stronger gun control measures.
They follow a shooting last week at a municipal center in Virginia Beach, Virginia, in which a gunman killed 12 people. Police recovered a high-capacity magazine and a silencer mechanism from the scene.
Virginia’s Democratic governor, Ralph Northam, said Tuesday he will summon lawmakers back to the state Capitol to consider a package of gun-control legislation. Republicans control the state’s legislature. Northam’s proposals include a ban on silencers and high-capacity magazines.
The Trump administration earlier this year banned bump stocks, devices that let a semi-automatic weapon fire like a machine gun.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 19052447? ago
I'm not going to square 40 years of immigration policy squarely on the Trump. Am I upset that half the stores in my neighborhood are Mexican? Sure. Was that a problem before Trump was President? Sure.
You have yet to provide a counterargument to my argument that election goals are subjective
How many governors have you killed now as a result of the automatic weapons ban? Again I'm not going to place 30 years of firearms policy squarely on Trump as if he's the only person in our government who has ever allowed something to be banned.
Ok
>>13365679
That's objectively false though, no point in even arguing against it
>>13365682
Here's the image that I was banned from normiechan for, how many threads were made with that image? I think last time someone brought it up it was over 120
If you think you're the only retard yelling in to a sea of retards about arming up then you're more retarded than the average retard. The only difference between you and I is that I put a mark on a piece of paper 3 years ago, other than that you and I have done the exact same nothing except you probably haven't even pushed people to buy guns considering how sheepish you are to answer the question
Here's a quick guide to building your own AR-15 on the cheap.
This is the first part we're going to buy and it's the most important. This is the only part of an AR-15 that is regulated, you can purchase everything else without getting a background check except this. It will need to be mailed to a local dealer who will charge you a fee and background check you.
https://palmettostatearmory.com/psa-ar-15-lower-safe-fire-1728.html
This kit contains the entire rest of the rifle. Stock, barrel, grip, trigger, barrel all that good stuff. It's a more basic kit but it will be enough to get you started on the AR-15 platform.
https://palmettostatearmory.com/psa-16-mid-length-5-56-nato-1-7-phosphate-classic-rifle-kit-5165448467.html
This punch set will help with assembly and is a good tool set to have for beginners.
https://palmettostatearmory.com/wheeler-engineering-brass-punch-set-8-piece.html
These are your run of the mill magazines. I'd say 10 is a good start but you can get as many or little as you want. You can also likely head down to any local gun store to purchase some and meet your local FLGS owner.
https://palmettostatearmory.com/d-h-5-56-30rd-aluminum-magazine-8416.html
After you get the parts it's time to assemble your rifle.
https://youtu.be/p8sY5CQmlHI
Some things to consider at this point:
https://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/product_info.php/products_id/4997/Firearms/Rifles/Smith+%26+Wesson/M%26P+15+Rifles/S%26W+M%26P+15+SPORT+II+.223%2F5.56+16
Want a full rifle instead? The S&W Sport II is your standard 'modern musket'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYjbSGO30K0
[–] 19052449? ago
It's an objective fact that he's implemented an Executive Order, unchallenged by the courts, to ban bump-stocks that's in effect which infringes on the rights of Americans to be able to challenge the federal government. It's also an objective fact that he never campaigned on ending legal immigration and is the same as a Democrat in doing anything about replacing whites and is therefore as consciously involved in disempowering whites. All objective facts. You are lying or just ignorant, which is worse?
You don't need to, you can blame him for directly for his own impotence as regards to making a policy that benefits whites, unless you have no interest in seeing whites not be replaced.
Not enough to stop yourself from voting for a guy that will only aid in that fact. Which raises the question as to your sincerity. I don't think you honestly give a shit if you'll vote for the guy who has no problem increasing the number of Mexicans as long as it's legal.
If you are white then they are actually objective, and implying they are subjective begs the question as to your own ethnicity.
That doesn't make it acceptable, let alone an excuse to vote for the damn guy.
Completely empty response devoid of any meaning. Passive-aggressive if nothing else.
[–] 19052450? ago
Why do people use absolutes so willy-nilly? It's objectively false that 'the only change' he's done has been infringing my rights and disempowering whites. Name a thing Trump has done that you like