One thing I've noticed lately, and I'm a bit of a sperg so I guess I'm late, is almost all leftist males talk with vocal fry. I'm assuming you also have noticed because leftist males are everywhere. Non-leftist males don't really seem to possess it, though. Has the phenomenon ever been studied? It's kind of like the voice gay men have – i.e., it's culturally transmitted and adopted.
This ties into politics, obviously; so I though I'd throw it into the mix and try to generate some productive discussion, given how widespread this is.
OP - https://8ch.net/pol/res/13357954.html
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 19016643? ago
you're in over your head, femshill. allow yourself some illumination. You agreed with me by saying they are just products of their surroundings. They follow men who put their panic-ridden minds at ease. They find solace in the presence of a man who removes their agency and tells them what's expected of them. When provided with children and the burden of labor for bread is removed they are happy as can be.
[–] 19034500? ago
Women dont have agency anon. Theyre simple like land waiting to be cultivated. Abused or fallow land is wild and angry. Well tended land is fertile beautiful and happy. Most male angst against women comes from expecting a sexbrofriend and getting a woman instead. Soulmates are a myth unless you consider land might have a soul and grow to love the farmer who tends to it.
[–] 19017510? ago
It's exactly this, women are social creatures who rely on a pack mentality. They will follow whatever is deemed to be socially orthodox. It's obvious from a young age where girls are obsessed with being popular, wearing the right clothes, listening to the right music. This has somewhat bled onto some men due to feminisation, but it's still clearly a feminine trait that is near universal in the womenfolk whilst comparatively rare in men. It is important to note that women are shaped by the social orthodoxy as opposed to following their natural or instinctive path; women have not been 'liberated', women are not naturally promiscuous or naturally anything, they conform to whatever they deem to be the correct path; and as such you will find that women are capable of being the most 'racist', hateful and intolerant of people - because to them these abstract philosophical ideas that men reach through logic, study and debate; are simply the status quo, social norms that must be upheld regardless of their veracity lest the woman be subject to exile for non-conformity.
What a woman considers as 'socially orthodox' is based upon her environment. This is basically where the /pol/ack idea of 'find a girl in Church' comes from; if a girl attends Church, she is likely to have been brought up around Christian parents, especially in this day and age where Church attendance is so low; and as such should hold certain morals like reverence for the man in her life, respect for her family, and an acceptance that she should 'be fruitful and multiply' - essentially everything we want in a wife. A woman who has been brought up in state schools and around hollywood movies will be rebellious, hyper-sexual and entitled, as well as somewhat narcissistic. This is further exacerbated as they are subjected to the undiluted judaic filth that saturates our so-called 'academia'.
You will also note that women go through multiple stages in their life. They try to 'find themselves'. What this really means is that they have encountered several different cultural groups and that their orthodoxy came into question and appeared to be replaced a new orthodoxy; this leads to internal strife as the woman cannot decide which way is the correct way. Inevitably she will side with one, the one which she is around more, and this will lead to her 'cutting people out of her life'. Often with college girls this means cutting their families out, many say they will never return to whatever 'backwards' town they came from, they will decry their parents as abusers who 'stifled' them, and in short - they will reject them in entirety, often ceasing all relations whatsoever; and thats with bonds as strong as family. Should the woman get married, she will nearly always conform to what her man believes and this is why married women are far more likely to support conservative opinions and beliefs. Some posit that this has to do with their children as well, but I personally doubt it as their obsession with social orthodoxy is a constant throughout the rest of their lives; and presumably they would still seek to keep their child safe in the same way they keep themselves safe, through conformity. As such it is far more likely that they conform to the husband as opposed to 'waking up to the needs of their male children'.
[–] 19048809? ago
Truth. When men conform to social norms, there's is always an ulterior motive be it fitting in at the frat club, the corporate club, or being a turbo chad yet marrying a woman, having kids and playing house in order to get a promotion from your old white southern christian conservative boss.
[–] 19026260? ago
[–] 19018811? ago
Women will pick their peer group (which nowadays includes the television set and friend feed) over their children any day of the week. They only have a protective instinct over their children in the most direct sense of impending danger. If their peer group is pushing an agenda that goes against the interests of their children and is in any way abstract and can be rationalized, they will pick that over the long term well-being of their children. This is why so many women pimp out their children to boyfriends, or to gender "transition" virtue signaling, sexual promiscuity, or to race-mixing, even though it's in direct counter to the interests of their children. They also will never hold a belief that makes them feel guilty about their past. If they were a slut, they will push their children and peers towards being a slut as well to rationalize their own behavior rather than face a cognitive dissonance.
[–] 19017511? ago
This was informative, eye opening and terrifying. Quality post.
[–] 19017007? ago
With the men they follow they have fake relationships i dont think you follow what im saying. Im starting to think that you are a kike or a complete goy. The things you said dont connect to one another just blunt sentences of your anger driven opinion. Im not going to argue point by point for that reason. ((Illuminate yourself))→ kill yourself
[–] 19017010? ago
the anger you sense is projection. i agree with you that women know not to breed with lesser men. my point is that lesser men and give them agency, which they despise.