The Mormons are the church in the US closest to cucking that can still be brought back from the brink.
The majority of Mormons are solid, clean-living people with strong culturally conservative instincts. But prog cancer is spreading surprisingly quickly. Until recently you only saw it online but the progs have become bolder, speaking up in church services and trying to force institutional changes.
In many parts of North America there's a shortage of men. Porn and video games are the main reason. Guys get sucked into those, don't go on their mission and stop attending church out of shame/depression/cynicism. Every time it happens, one more faithful girl doesn't have a husband. It's worst in the Mountain West. In some YSA wards there are two or three women for every man. It isn't worth going into the reasons for this. Mistakes were made. We compromised too much with modernity.
I'm a Mormon (Latter-day Saint is the preferred term these days), 28, a grad student, married, two kids, closeted cynical right-winger and I've never posted on a board like this before. But desperate times, right.
I won't be able to take it if the church cucks. What we've created is too fucking amazing to lose. Deseret is the closest humanity has ever come to utopia. We need more solid Mormon families, more babies. There are beautiful girls (Mormons are mostly English and Scandinavian stock) growing old without ever bearing children.
I'm begging you. I know you think Mormonism is ridiculous. I know, magic underwear and planets and whatever. But you've got it wrong. I'm begging you. Find some missionaries, take the leap and go full Mormon. Quit the weed, the video games and the porn. Be a man. Get off the internet. Find a good girl, she'll follow your lead. She needs you.
I won't be posting on here again. Godspeed.
OP - https://8ch.net/pol/res/13353047.html
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 19061701? ago
Longevity has nothing to do with smelly old men fucking young women, 'anon'. Longevity is from older women have children later (as someone with a statistics interest you should already know this). The older a woman is when she has viable children means increasing longevity for that genetic line because subsequent generations (if they continue the trend) remain youthful longer. Your scenario where decrepity diseased old men fuck young women and use up their youth rather than giving them to virile young men with a future (MUH DICK NEED PUSSY ANON) does nothing for longevity at all.
[–] 19061711? ago
And when the woman is able to breed past 30-40, there is a high rate of deformity. This does not happen with older fathers. It has to do with simple biology. Sperm are continously regenerated while eggs are present from the beginning of life and just get older and older. It would take a much greater evolutionary shift to allow old women to have viable offspring.
[–] 19061715? ago
BioChem major here anon. You cannot BULLSHIT ME like you can BULLSHIT others on /pol/. You are just lying.
[–] 19061704? ago
It does. It has been almost single handedly responsible for increasing the life span of humans. Women cannot breed past 30-40 years of age depending on the woman. That just doesn't change. A man can breed at 90 is he is still alive strong attractive and successful. The best men often do breed into their 70s or 80s. Look at Mick Jagger. Since these children had a father that was able to outlive the majority of the population, they too have a genetic proclivity to outliving the majority of the population.
[–] 19061706? ago
COMPLETELY FULL OF SHIT
GOD HELP US IF YOU ARE ACTUALLY A BIO OR STEM STUDENT