The Mormons are the church in the US closest to cucking that can still be brought back from the brink.
The majority of Mormons are solid, clean-living people with strong culturally conservative instincts. But prog cancer is spreading surprisingly quickly. Until recently you only saw it online but the progs have become bolder, speaking up in church services and trying to force institutional changes.
In many parts of North America there's a shortage of men. Porn and video games are the main reason. Guys get sucked into those, don't go on their mission and stop attending church out of shame/depression/cynicism. Every time it happens, one more faithful girl doesn't have a husband. It's worst in the Mountain West. In some YSA wards there are two or three women for every man. It isn't worth going into the reasons for this. Mistakes were made. We compromised too much with modernity.
I'm a Mormon (Latter-day Saint is the preferred term these days), 28, a grad student, married, two kids, closeted cynical right-winger and I've never posted on a board like this before. But desperate times, right.
I won't be able to take it if the church cucks. What we've created is too fucking amazing to lose. Deseret is the closest humanity has ever come to utopia. We need more solid Mormon families, more babies. There are beautiful girls (Mormons are mostly English and Scandinavian stock) growing old without ever bearing children.
I'm begging you. I know you think Mormonism is ridiculous. I know, magic underwear and planets and whatever. But you've got it wrong. I'm begging you. Find some missionaries, take the leap and go full Mormon. Quit the weed, the video games and the porn. Be a man. Get off the internet. Find a good girl, she'll follow your lead. She needs you.
I won't be posting on here again. Godspeed.
OP - https://8ch.net/pol/res/13353047.html
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 19056713? ago
Are you 'studying genetics and statistics' here on /pol/, meaning '/pol/ is your university'? Because it sure sounds like you have discarded science in favor of /pol/talk 101.
I dislike polygamy, not for women, because it doesn't matter to us, we can hold our breath and PRETEND to enjoy your disgusting body while we fantasize about a beautiful man our own age with our interests who shares our thoughts and generations humor and goals. I care about polygamy because it destabilizes society when only a few men get to breed. It bottlenecks a population rather than allowing diversity within the race. And unlike you, I know that 'the best quality men' are not the ones who climb to the top via slaughter and immorality (which if you took a hard look at any of the inane examples that you have in your head) you would realize that they are all immoral filth who have gain power through the means that men ALWAYS gain power. If there was honor and goodness in an of the sewage you call leadership WOULD WE EVEN HAVE THIS OP?
No fucktard, they are all kikes or kneeling to the kikes. And you are supporting their retardation and the system that is destroying your own people. They are all leading your people to the WORST FUCKING ERRORS ON CAN MAKE…THE BETRAYAL OF THEIR RACE. You are so fucking stupid that you are trying to defend what is indefensible, immoral and filthy…just for PUSSY…YOU HAVE NO STANDARDS AND ARE A FUCKING WANKER PUSSY HOUND AND THE LAST THING YOU SHOULD BE IN CHARGE OF IS EVEN ONE WOMAN. Let alone a stable of retards who were too slow or too stupid to get away from you.
[–] 19061703? ago
You have redpilled me anon. I no longer believe women are capable of selecting mates in the modern world.
That beautiful man may will not look so beautiful if he has to find his own food, fight for his property or outthink his enemies. Most of these chads would have ended up looking like hobbled slack jawed yockels with missing teeth and slurred speech because they didn't have the genetic quality to take care of themselves.
Sharing interests do not matter for mate selection. That is just a tribal, ingroup artifact. Your interests are now (((media))) driven. If we put you back 1000 years before now and you had to choose between potentially starving to death or sharing interests, evolution would have taken care of you for choosing interests.
Wow. I always thought more intelligent or better quality women could make reasonable choices in modern society. Guess not. I am so redpilled on this now.
[–] 19061713? ago
Only a faggot would think that I was talking about the physical appearance. Beautiful almost certainly means something different to both of us. In your case it is obviously a twit teen cunt that you are thinking of and not someone who is beautiful because they are masculine, humorous or adventurous.
[–] 19061696? ago
Are you on your period or just neck deep in pinko university indoctrination? Pseudoscience is not real anon.
Actually, no. Very few Mormons are on welfare and they get married before children.
They should marry the best regardless of age. Genetic quality does not decrease based on appearance. A male at 80 has less reproductive degradation than a female in early 30s. Young women marrying old men has been responsible for increasing humans life spans to twice that of chimps. Fertility declines rapidly for women after 30, whereas men can have children sometimes till 80.
Think with your mind you loopy cunt.
[–] 19061701? ago
Longevity has nothing to do with smelly old men fucking young women, 'anon'. Longevity is from older women have children later (as someone with a statistics interest you should already know this). The older a woman is when she has viable children means increasing longevity for that genetic line because subsequent generations (if they continue the trend) remain youthful longer. Your scenario where decrepity diseased old men fuck young women and use up their youth rather than giving them to virile young men with a future (MUH DICK NEED PUSSY ANON) does nothing for longevity at all.
[–] 19061697? ago
Lying does not help your case.