You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 18849050? ago 

>>13324301

He isn't pushing a narrative.

He definitely is, whether or not you agree with that narrative is the question.

This is an intellectual discussion. Not rabble rousing.

Its a discussion, wherein a given party is being querried and presenting their narrative positions on various topics - in this case, a man who claims his 'mentor' was a zionist jewish man (Paul Gottfried) and who is now saying that "zionism is not an enemy in the context of controlling media narratives", claiming "the jewish question is just so complex" and promoting the narrative of the holohoax (whether for optics or not, pretty irrelevant).

You don't know from what perspective he is saying these things.

I do though.

He doesn't come from a "conservative" standpoint that says "We aren't responsible for Slavery, because it wasn't us that did it".

He should.

He agrees with the Left that White People represent a history, where as Conservatives deny that History.

No, no, no. "Conservatives" don't deny that history at all, they embrace it and cuck on it. Nationalists, however, point out that much of the 'history' presented IS IN FACT A LIE. And those lies form the narrative foundation which acts to inhibit such activies as explicit White advocacy. As such, they MUST BE CONFRONTED (as opposed to 'embraced' or 'owned') because to internalize these narratives is to legitimize and solidify EVEN FURTHER the foundations which act to inhibit what is necessary to serve a truly Nationalistic stance.

It's a kinda unique perspective of the Alt/New/dissident Right.

Yes, its very cucky. Its EXTREMELY cucky, and almost-certainly for optics - which basically everyone with half a brain sees through immediately. If its NOT for optics, also a possibility and a strong point of suspicion because of his stance on zionism and associations therewith, then he's trying to poison his own people with a weak cucky narrative which will only act to inhibit.

He basically says to just take ownership of ALL of our history, good and bad.

Taking ownership of a false history which is inherently designed and aimed to discredit your very perpetuation as a biologic and cultural clade, consciously and purposefully internalizing such a thing, is the paramount of dysgenic behaviors.