You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 18849045? ago 

Richard Spencer was mentored by a Jew and glows in the dark.

So what? Is every interaction with a jew bad?

And glow in the dark is not an argument.

He was signal boosted by mainstream media just like other aut kike figures back during 2015 - 2017.

Untill he wasn't. And he wanted their attention and got it.

Supporting controlled opposition figures poisons this movement.

He isn't controlled opposition though. How do you know? Farage is. Tommy Robinson is. All the populist parties that slow the process of replacement, legimitize it.

0
0

[–] 18849051? ago 

>>13324292

So what? Is every interaction with a jew bad?

In a mentorship capacity? Yes.

Jews are wretched creatures and are the (((great enemy))) of our kin, and the primary source above all others of our current woes. Thus, mentorship beneath such a creature, is certainly a terrible omen.

Untill he wasn't. And he wanted their attention and got it.

And they used him, he didn't use them; then he killed his own branding by foolishly associating with questionable characters and then turning on them and the audiences they had generated. Now… I haven't heard anything meaningful out of him in quite some time, probably since that livestream where IT SURE FUCKING SEEMED he had a Black woman in his apartment during a livestream.

He isn't controlled opposition though.

He certainly appears so.

How do you know?

I've described as much in detail, but you can't really KNOW with certainty in this scenarios, so asking that and then going to what you say next seems somewhat ridiculous.

Farage is.

Yes, he is.

Tommy Robinson is.

Yes, he is.

Does that in any way inhibit Spencer from also being such? No, not at all.

All the populist parties that slow the process of replacement, legimitize it.

I'd agree with that sentiment to at least some extent, namely in regards to the suggetion that it ought not be slowed, but halted entirely.

0
0

[–] 18849337? ago 

>>13324303

>>13324301

>>13324298

>>13324299

Yeah, you're fucking stupid by the sound of it my man. That's retarded.

Why? Have you looked at /pol/? At 4chan? Internet memes? Pewdiepie himself?

Welcome to 1928.

Point taken. But it still feels so lonely.

I've seen this, but, I haven't seen it approximating anything like what you're suggesting.

Really? Do you not see the masses of men that seem to be somehow aware that men and women aren't the same, but at the same time extremely disappointed and expected the world would be more fair, if men and women were the same?

You weren't, and I have NO IDEA why you would think that.

Then why are we here on /pol/? Why are right-wing youtubers so popular on Youtube? I thought that meant something. I thought young people were informing themselves online and watching our content.

I don't think that's true either

How can you deny what I just said and also deny this? How many active IPs are there on /pol? 2126? How many unique visitors would that be in a month? Anywhere close enough to make a difference?

Islam is just a sword. Without the jews, Islam is nothing

That's not true. Islam caused the European Dark Age. What do you think of, when you hear Pirates? Muslim Pirates enslaved Millions of White Europeans. Cut us off from important trade routes. Dominated the Mediterranean and made us less interconnected and rely on an agrarian, feudal economy. They raided our territory. They almost took over Europe from one side through Spain and then another side through Anatolia, untill they reached Vienna.

This is what I mean. It's not just Jews always. Without Jews, we would still have conflicts.

, referring to control over media and "how we dream" (whatever the fuck that means…), and that's an absolutely nonsensical statement in-context given the various connections of that sort between media and zionism.

Watch Unconscious cinema please. And don't you see how he literally agrees with you and goes even further. Jews do control our dreams, because they make all of the stories we consume.

You think being exposed to that doesn't influence the way you think?

Declaring war on ISIS IS declaring war on jews

No, it's not. Words have meanings. You can't just say that and expect it to make sense.

That's the problem, when you make everything about Jews. Dont you see how nonsensical that sounds?

I disagree with that in-entirety, particularly in the context of the israeli zionists.

Jews are not a problem, because they have a nationstate in the middle East, anon. And no that doesn't mean that Israel isn't a problem, before you accuse me of being a Zionist. I am just saying they aren't harming us since the founding of that state.

Taking ownership of a false history which is inherently designed and aimed to discredit your very perpetuation as a biologic and cultural clade, consciously and purposefully internalizing such a thing, is the paramount of dysgenic behaviors.

Jews weren't oppressed in the Third Reich?