You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 18848661? ago 

>>13324153

>>13324123

Look at how people treat Richard Spencer, who is an extremely intelligent guy with profund insights on the political Zeitgeist.

He is a much better Intellectual than a Leader for Protests.

Is he? I don't think so.

I don't see him as an ally at all, because of exactly what I said to you before about zionists.

I had my suspicions for a very long time, but I kept an open mind. Then I saw this.

<Vid related

And all that fell away.

Anyone who telling you "islam is the real problem, not the zionist jews" is not ally - he's compromised, or he was never an ally at all.

I really like his "Leftists are sorta right in the wrong way and for the wrong reasons" takes.

I always found him rather less than convincing and a bit of a blow hard to be honest.

I'm more partial to Kais Murros as far as commentary goes, but Spencer has an occasional gem of insight… A shame he's ruined any faith I can or will have in him by shilling for zionism.

Literally happened with Spencer. People attack him just because he says that Israel might be a good example on how to do things. People get triggered over this simple objective compliments.

Vid related is far more than what you imply my man.

If you don't see that, well… Guess I'm back to calling you an emotionally-compromised idiot or a subversive LARPer, because I can't see any other way you could view

<vid related

and come to the conclusion that such was merely a claim of "israel being a good example" or a "simple objective compliment". This is the man saying "zionist jews are not our existential enemies like muzzies are u guiz!" and that is the objective opposition, its having a fight with your enemies' sword instead of the enemy himself, and nobody who pushes such a narrative line can be trusted. Especially not one with so many ties to zionist jewry, going all the way back to his ((('mentor'))).

0
0

[–] 18849334? ago 

0
0

[–] 18849338? ago 

Imo we should outlaw all sexual stimulation for heterosexual men. Make every sexual act rape. Ban porn. Ban masturbation.

I think this would in short oder lead to a better society. :)

0
0

[–] 18849336? ago 

0
0

[–] 18848667? ago 

There's other issues with Spencer as well, mind you, but they are somewhat "complex" themselves in terms of how people rationalize narrative positions presented by "intellectuals" and the like.

I understand how people will argue that "holocaust denial is not beneficial to the movement!" or the like, but… If you're not going to deny, you should simply maintain a neutral/silent position. Pushing the jewish narrative on this front is explicitly shooting yourself in the foot, if you're attempting to pursue explicit White advocacy, because jews view explicit White advocacy as a threat, they have established a strong holohoax-based narrative opposing explicit White advocacy and have used it to condition/propagandize, with several major organizations backing that effort.

As such, while it may be true that holohoax denial has bad optical traits, its also strategically a dead-end to embrace that narrative which is most-commonly employed to demonize the very concept of explicit White advocacy regardless of expressed intent on behalf of the advocate in question.

0
0

[–] 18848668? ago 

Optics are dead.