The Green Party gained 20+% of the vote. 30+% among young people.
I can't stop thinking about that we need something radically new in the current century and that old-school right-wing politics isn't enough. What do these populist parties even offer? Just get rid of all immigrants and all will be fine? Then we will continue our current economic policies, our current social policies? That it?
I agree with the Left that a lot of the Populism is just talk to get populist support to gain power. The old Grachian brother and Tribune of the Plebs move.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLNvcTK6DTU
Farage for example is worshipped by many people, despite cucking the BNP, preventing UKIP from developing to something more than just an Anti-EU party and prevented them from becoming more nationalist.
If we can't get rid of refugees and immigrants, because you just get turned from wherever you are on the political spectrum to ultra far right, why not build camp-cities for them in our country and try to extract as much value from them as possible? They are coming here on their own. Why not use them as an economic ressource and exploit it as much as possible for the benefit of us?
And radically invest in Education, public transport, development of Green Spaces, National Parks. Try to become energy independet from fossil fuels ASAP.
And the EU. You know, old school nationalism and trying to take Prussia back won't work. The EU is a good way to fullfill our geopoltiical ambitions. We just need to adjust it in a better direction.
Why does Latvia and Estonia need to be independent? They are just going to be influenced by Russia, the US or China. Why not have a European Empire? I agree with Richard Spencer. Being anti EU is too short-sighted.
I am seriously thinking about these issues and I think that something like this might be much more succesful, than bruteforcing deporation of refugees and migrants, which will just get you hated. I think many Lefties would support that.
Can you talk me out of that?
OP - https://8ch.net/pol/res/13323687.html
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 18848186? ago
>>13324047
Okay then, then what I'm saying should make a great deal of sense to you.
If I had voted when I was 'young' (how is 'young' being defined here, btw?), I'd have voted Democrat in all likelihood. By the time I was 30, that had all changed. That's the story for a great many people, and the difficulty of letting young people vote: They're fucking stupid and short-sighted and, especially in Europe, HEAVILY propagandized to, such that most won't come to their sense until they're well out of university. My guess would be that the NSDAP wouldn't have done too well with the 'young' in some of their early-stage attempts either. Do you have evidence of the contrary? Genuinely interested to learn more about this scenario.
So was reading Origin of the Species at 29 for me.
Who is 'we', nigger?
'We' aren't doing ANYTHING.
If you think, say, AfD, is demonstrable of /pol/? Get real! 'We' do not presently have a political platform, not even the potential for one, because we represent direct threat to (((the parasite))), and so, until we have conditions such that we can deal with the parasite, you won't make much headway. Thankfully, as usually happens, the consequences of (((the parasite)))'s action are being felt in a big way, and it will get worse in time. Just like it did during the Weimar.
I'd really like some of those evidentiary questions asked above to be answered, and I hope you won't take that as an attack.
Checking out the second bit next.