You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 18848183? ago 

You mean the populism

No, I mean populism isn't "old school right wing politics", hence I was querrying what EXACTLY you are referring to. Please be specific.

look above your post

Its amazing stuff!

Bringing back the old forests.

So you simultaneously want post-industrialization AND large swathes of old-growth forest?

You don't see the likelihood of any… Conflict, any contradiction, therein?

… Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying there HAS to be, mind you, but…

And you are being fooled that we'd live in a paradise, if we deported all immigrants tomorrow.

No I'm not, I'm pointing out that you're talking about national parks while being demographically displaced. IOW: You're missing the rape squads for the trees.

Why didn't young people vote for the AfD?

How did the young people vote with regards to the NSDAP during their rise to prominence?

Because they denied climate change and weren't pro enviroment enough.

So you want to advance to the stars while engaging power-generation methodologies that are innately insufficient for our needs - find me someone acknowledging anthropic climate change as a potential hazard (if not presently extant; at least, not in the ways most-commonly addressed) and 'pro environment' stances that ALSO embrace nuclear power, because I'd like to meet one besides myself - while talking about the environment and importing millions of migrants via petrol-based platforms thereby negating any and all environmental effect?

And do you have evidence that such is ACTUALLY why they didn't support those parties, as opposed to, ya know, the German youth being AGGRESSIVELY propagandized to and subject to literally decades of post-deNazificiation social engineering? If so, please provide it - I'm not accusing you of NOT having it, I'm asking to see it for myself.

Natural geopolitics would inevitably

The EU is not a good thing, period. A thing in that vein developed after the decline of such an incredibly-flawed and utterly corrupted mechanism? Maybe. But the EU? Nah. That's like saying the US can be saved. Nonsense.

You always lalk about something negative.

Oh?

Can't talk about any issue, because first "we have to kill the kikes and all spics and niggers".

Well, first off, you're current on /pol/, not necessarily seeing how a /pol/ack candidate - lel - would approach narrative and discussion, so thats a bit disingenuous on your behalf.

Second, face it man - if you can't deal with (the "kill" bit is a bit of an exaggeration IMHO) these problems, you're not actually making any headway. And if you try to get in power and THEN deal with these problems, your support will evaporate very quickly, because the enemy controls the press, and so, while their pawns might be protected, yours will not. Hence, if you try to sell people one thing and pursue another once in power, you will be fucked.

And really, you have to face it man: Point 3, you HAVE TO DEAL WITH THE KIKES AND MUDMEN INVADERS. If you don't, NONE OF THE 'GREEN' SHIT WILL MATTER IN 20 YEARS, because you will have been demographically displaced and the people coming in behind DO NOT GIVE A SHIT about the environment. These people voting 'Green' and shit, they're being fed pleasant lies, just like the folks voting for "populists" running on the platform of nothing more than "REMOVE MUDMEN AND THEN KEEP BEING SHITTY PHILOSOPHICALLY".

0
0

[–] 18848674? ago 

find me someone acknowledging anthropic climate change as a potential hazard (if not presently extant; at least, not in the ways most-commonly addressed) and 'pro environment' stances that ALSO embrace nuclear power, because I'd like to meet one besides myself

Pavle Mocilac, PhD, University of Manchester

0
0

[–] 18848676? ago 

What're his views on mass immigration and how is he received (ie, as an exceptional case, yay or nay; and specifically how does the left treat him)?