You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 18821313? ago 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2c1siCGv78

around 13 min

states how his info about a CIA kidnapping ring is just ignored, and how the childs are used for sacrifices

this is coming from this guy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Gunderson

Theodore L. Gunderson (November 7, 1928 – July 31, 2011) was an American Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agent In Charge and head of the Los Angeles FBI.

Doesnt mention Masons, but we know they are the ones active in the highest Echolons of the government, so guess who has the power to make the CIA kidnap children shut up the FBI.

Bill admits hillary speaks with the dead

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRav-34ufcE

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/14333

With fingers crossed, the old rabbit's foot out of the box in the attic, I will be sacrificing a chicken in the backyard to Moloch . . .

chicken

moloch

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moloch

Moloch (Phoenician: 𐤌𐤋𐤊, Masoretic מֹלֶךְ mōlek, Greek Μολόχ) is the biblical name of a Canaanite god associated with child sacrifice.

moloch

childsacrifices

pic related from alefantis instagram

chickenlover

no chicken in sight

just a kid

man, i really wonder what was sacrificed there. its undeniable that (((they))) are communing with evil spirits

>>13318833

Why were the native religions of Europe so vehemently dealt with by the imposing monolithic (((Christians))) from the East?

maybe because the pagans were constantly raiding christian territory. Dont forget the Christians were hunted down and killed in the most brutal ways for around 2 centuries by rome. Killing those that go against what you perceive as truth was just the normal way to go

Why were the practices of self-actualization towards godhood and notions of inherent honor replaced with the ideas that man is born tainted with original sin (separated from God) and that one the gift (grace) of God can “save” the individual?

if you think you are already a state of perfection you wont aim to better yourself. If you realize you are but a husk of what you could be you will strive to reach your full potential.

a system of morality that is objective, rather than subjective, as it really is

except that is bullshit, unless you want to argue that a pedophilic childmurderer is just as good as a guy running into a burning orphanage to save the children. If morality is subjective then there is no morality at all and merely oppinions of what morality should be, and the moral of the pedophile would be as legit as that of anyone else. Only with objective morals, for which we need the most high, the uncontested God to decide what these are, morals gain any relevance. If you say they are subjective you might as well say there is nor morality in the universe at all.

Fuck them and their sick way of thinking that by seeking the path

why? if there is no morality then might as well go for that. You disagreeing with them then matters not at all.

0
0

[–] 18829809? ago 

maybe because the pagans were constantly raiding christian territory

Fair enough.

But it’s not as though being born with inherent honor gives you nothing to strive for or struggle against. The challenge is remaining true in the face of all adversities, employing right thought, right words, and right action.

Morality IS subjective. No two people are ever going to share the exact same opinions on everything. The fact that pedophilic childmurderers exist is evidence that to those actions are not morally out of the question to some people.

It is each true man’s struggle to make these decisions carefully. His actions will have consequences that will either improve or tarnish his honor that he has carried with him, particularly within his own group.

Letting an external source dictate what is morally acceptable for you, whether it is a deity, a government, or any outside group, you resign yourself to outsourcing your ability to achieve godhood (self-actualization) and alter the world to your own will. Instead, you are subjected to the morals of another group that sees you as a competitor for resources, ultimately.

As you put it, “Killing those that go against what you perceive as truth was just the normal way to go.”

It still is, if you cannot separate yourself from the conflicting group. The way it is being done has simply changed shape.

(((They))) want you to dissolve your morals in place of theirs, not because morality is objective, but because it is dependent on the group you ask—actions have consequences. What benefits “them” is good for them. What benefits “us” is bad for them.

0
0

[–] 19055453? ago 

right thoughts, right words, right actions

All subjective.

honor

Subjective.

letting an external source dictate what is morally acceptable for you

Podesta did nothing wrong.

Stalin did nothing wrong.

Child rape is morally okay for some people, therefore why even oppose it? All subjective.

Nobody shares the exact same opinion about moral values! LEGALIZE CHILD MURDER!!!

achieve godhood

Muh Lucifer

what benefits them is good for them

Subjective. Facts only exist in your mind.