The Kabballah Tree of Life is basically a skilltree, similar to the chakra system. each of the circles references a "skill" or concept to be unlocked which the each influence another based on how a point is skilled. To unlock the next you must unlock the one before starting at the bottom. You can take the left or the right path or at the optimum a balanced one. left and right are opposed to another, they are represented by the 2 pillars in freemasonry, Boaz and Jachin and symbolize the duality of this world. good and evil, light and dark, strength and beauty, and supposedly you can achive godhood/God by reaching the top. Now this is very important: You cant.
Kabballist or gnostics usually try to push moral relativity. For example where gnostics say "All is one, one is all, thus God is also evil and i can find him through that just as i can find him through good" or through "God is merely a ruleset, the laws of nature and has no will, thus there is no absolute authority there saying what is good and evil and thus my definition is as good as the next one". Similary Kabbalists try to argue you need to do both, good and evil to find the middle path that leads right to God.
Lets look what the serpent baited Eve with
5“For God knows that in the day you eat of it, your eyes will be opened and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.”
you will be like God
Godhood through works/knowledge, and look where this brought us to. The only way Gnosis/knowledge leads to Godhood/salvation is by realizing that there is one true God and that only he can save you, and that this is Jesus Christ. All roads lead to rome and as such all logic leads to God.
A good way to explain it is the Chakrasystem which seems to be a somewhat simplified version.
The root chakra is your survival instincts. only if you rose above the constant fear of death you are able to actually process new experiences and evaluate them, see them from all angles outside of the threat they pose (sacral chakra), after that comes the solar plexus chakra responsible for our self esteem and self worth for which we have to see us in context of the new experiences and how we handle those. only once you love and value yourself you can start loving others (heart chakra), and love goes through the stomach, solar plexus>heart. next comes the throat chakra and the best speaches are those done by talking from your heart, what you truely care about and communication is the job of the throat chakra. Once you can formulate the truth properly there comes understanding and insight, the third eye chakra, and from this understanding you realize that everything is connected with another, the crown chakra
by putting you in a constant state of fear and anxiety they lock you in the lowest state of conciousness, occupied only with survival unable to really process any experiences. Early traumata like circumcission can alter your brain enough to effect your entire life.
All the fear propaganda all around merely is there to lock you into the lowest state of conciousness controlled by fear.
There is also the reptillian brain in charge of pretty much the same as the root chakra, survival instinct. Some people are "entirely" controlled by this area in the brain with every act only being there for survival. Stealing money from some guy, or even murdering people that threaten your lifestyle. The temptations of the flesh. The abuse and sodomy affecting the lowest chakra which is the easiest effected (iE through sodomy) due to its connection with the material.
The Serpent is a common symbol for evil because just as this chakra and conciousness is the lowest so is the snake crawling at the lowest on the ground representing the conciousness of the individual
OP - https://8ch.net/pol/res/13318069.html
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 18821311? ago
I’m not to say that the occult practices of Freemasons, Sabateans, Jews, or other groups are non-existent, nor do they have intangible results, but I do insist that those of us whom they seek to undermine with their practices becoming engrossed within this paradigm of their own creation is surely set up for them to have the advantage.
Why were the native religions of Europe so vehemently dealt with by the imposing monolithic (((Christians))) from the East? Why were the practices of self-actualization towards godhood and notions of inherent honor replaced with the ideas that man is born tainted with original sin (separated from God) and that one the gift (grace) of God can “save” the individual?
While it is true that Europe saw some of its greatest civilizational heights under Christendom, is there nothing to be said about the inherent European culture and spirit to account for this? What of the point that Christianity was more Germanicized than the other way around, to make it more palatable, as it spread through Europe? I will only briefly mention the Dark Ages brought on at least in part by Christianity, and subsequent Renaissance that embraced a return to the classical, pre-Christian world of philosophy and science.
Now, I think it can be said that we are living in a primarily post-Christian world. Even those who would self-identify as a Christian likely only wear the title loosely, without any substantial connection to the religion’s spirituality.
The way that I see it, the Abrahamic religions were created each to serve a purpose towards achieving a specific goal set by an original single group. Having multiple religious fronts forms a Nash equilibrium the same way that “Democrats” and “Republicans” function in the political sphere. The first step was a reduction in the European spirit of self-determination by imposing a slave morality (by convincing him to view the world in a system of morality that is objective, rather than subjective, as it really is) in which God is the ultimate external moral authority.
Christianity may not seem to have been harmful to European man when looking at its accomplishments, but it was still a foot in the door that has led us to a society in which the masses believe themselves to be virtuous because they are pious, wretched, poor, weak, suffering, needy, sick, and loathesome. This has further been exacerbated by democratic governments co-opted by corporations that must always be seen as “serving the customer,” so that the moral arbiters of our age are those who complain the most.
The reality is, whether or not we are inside some simulation, or dealing with an enemy that is able to employ the use of magic through ritualistic sacrifice and numerology, we are dealing with a group of people who are undoubtedly efficient movers, shakers, planners, and doers, leaving us with breadcrumbs to follow into the weeds instead of addressing them directly. Fuck them and their sick way of thinking that by seeking the path of “ultimate good” or “ultimate evil” they can achieve some form of godhood and supplant the Demiurge out of revenge for their perception of a hellish existence in this realm. There is no such thing as good or evil. Only actions and consequences. Neither the serpent nor the vermin think themselves evil for what they do. They understand reality is subjective and that, “what is injurious to me is injurious in itself.”
Everything about this Abrahamic dichotomy is meant to be a distraction. It seeds feelings of being unfulfilled with what this reality has to offer, and instead lures you into a trap of dualism that which can never be proven nor disproven, but asks you to simply have “faith.” I find it more likely that they would see themselves as the new Demiurge once they have control of the Earth and its raceless, androgynous, consumer drones.
If there is any “meaning” to our existence within this realm, it is for each of us to determine. I will fight to defend this world, because it is all I can be sure of existing, and if there is any sort of afterlife for me, it will be the honor of my actions that my descendants will carry unto the generations.
—Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil
[–] 18830211? ago
into the trash. jpg
[–] 18821313? ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2c1siCGv78
around 13 min
states how his info about a CIA kidnapping ring is just ignored, and how the childs are used for sacrifices
this is coming from this guy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Gunderson
Doesnt mention Masons, but we know they are the ones active in the highest Echolons of the government, so guess who has the power to make the CIA kidnap children shut up the FBI.
Bill admits hillary speaks with the dead
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MRav-34ufcE
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/14333
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moloch
pic related from alefantis instagram
man, i really wonder what was sacrificed there. its undeniable that (((they))) are communing with evil spirits
>>13318833
maybe because the pagans were constantly raiding christian territory. Dont forget the Christians were hunted down and killed in the most brutal ways for around 2 centuries by rome. Killing those that go against what you perceive as truth was just the normal way to go
if you think you are already a state of perfection you wont aim to better yourself. If you realize you are but a husk of what you could be you will strive to reach your full potential.
except that is bullshit, unless you want to argue that a pedophilic childmurderer is just as good as a guy running into a burning orphanage to save the children. If morality is subjective then there is no morality at all and merely oppinions of what morality should be, and the moral of the pedophile would be as legit as that of anyone else. Only with objective morals, for which we need the most high, the uncontested God to decide what these are, morals gain any relevance. If you say they are subjective you might as well say there is nor morality in the universe at all.
why? if there is no morality then might as well go for that. You disagreeing with them then matters not at all.
[–] 18829809? ago
Fair enough.
But it’s not as though being born with inherent honor gives you nothing to strive for or struggle against. The challenge is remaining true in the face of all adversities, employing right thought, right words, and right action.
Morality IS subjective. No two people are ever going to share the exact same opinions on everything. The fact that pedophilic childmurderers exist is evidence that to those actions are not morally out of the question to some people.
It is each true man’s struggle to make these decisions carefully. His actions will have consequences that will either improve or tarnish his honor that he has carried with him, particularly within his own group.
Letting an external source dictate what is morally acceptable for you, whether it is a deity, a government, or any outside group, you resign yourself to outsourcing your ability to achieve godhood (self-actualization) and alter the world to your own will. Instead, you are subjected to the morals of another group that sees you as a competitor for resources, ultimately.
As you put it, “Killing those that go against what you perceive as truth was just the normal way to go.”
It still is, if you cannot separate yourself from the conflicting group. The way it is being done has simply changed shape.
(((They))) want you to dissolve your morals in place of theirs, not because morality is objective, but because it is dependent on the group you ask—actions have consequences. What benefits “them” is good for them. What benefits “us” is bad for them.