You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 18744902? ago 

Honestly I see government support to be completely meaningless on the subject for a very simple reason:

If I were in the shoes of the government and I knew, without a doubt, that vaccines did cause whatever life-changing negative condition in 3% of cases: I would cover up the evidence and endorse them.

Ignore our cynicism about that for a moment, the job of the government, supposedly, is to care about what is good for the whole. So with that as a value-set, vaccines would have to be incredibly dangerous before recommending against them because the danger is only to the individual while the benefit is to the whole.

To put it simply and comically: Even if I knew a vaccine carries with it a 5% chance of immediate painful death, I would support my neighbor's family getting it. It'll make me 1% less likely to pick up whatever disease because they'd be immune and I'm not the one rolling the dice of death.

So with all that in mind, its safe to say that government endorsement means basically nothing. I wouldn't call it a negative since I don't really see any reason to do so.

0
0

[–] 18765293? ago 

It's easier in countries with medicare like Canada. The flu shot propaganda talks up "herd" (see goyim) immunity for example. It's very easy to get those under the grips of the media jew to comply.

t. remembers an entire train on the Toronto subway of government flu-shot propaganda: every ad in the train plus "take the shot, goy!" wraps on the livery

0
0

[–] 18759061? ago 

faggot