You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 18710497? ago 

I just finished reading Siege a few days ago and have no idea where its blood curdling reputation comes from. It's far, far tamer than The Turner Diaries.

From my understanding of it Mason seems to be arguing that whites should drop out of society, start their own communities, ride out the collapse and then come back and start the NatSoc revolution. It seems close to Manson's Helter Skelter scenario, which is probably one of the reasons why he was attracted to Charlie. Manson wanted to find a cave known as the 'bottomless pit' in Death Valley where his followers would wait out the race war he planned to start.

This seems closest to survivalism, rather than Atomwaffen/NSLF style activities.

0
0

[–] 18716158? ago 

>>13297407

I'm not arguing that violent revolution is not necessary or that we need a race war coming in our minecraft server. I'm saying that SIEGE is not National Socialism, is not a functional set of beliefs to create a society on, and it springs from a sentiment of nihilism which can only be explained with MURICA IS DED ITS NIGGERS FAULT.

National Socialism is about love, Siege is about hate, so Siege is not NS. Don't believe me? Read literally three pages of Kurt Eggers' writings.

inb4: need for change of beliefs

'ich kampfe' specifically instructs new NS to NEVER let the principles go. And since it was written by people who accomplished more than us, I think we can follow its advice.

0
0

[–] 18724609? ago 

The whole point of Siege was to diagnose why National Socialism had failed in the US post-1945. Mason was simply arguing that electoral politics and Rockwell style grandstanding had had their day and were no longer relevant because the system would never let us win at their game. That's not nihilism or hatred, it's just an extremely obvious observation.