Just wanted to reference this book anons. I dont see it talked up much on here, maybe i just miss the posts. Might is Right by Ragnar Redbeard has helped shape my mind to be geared for action and has aided in shaking off any Abrahamic & Equality System programming i still had early on. Between that and Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil its helped me refine the traits that are played on by the Jews and their cronies for the preservation of this bullshit monster system. Im hoping we can discuss this book (for those who've read it) whatever insights or criticisms we have, and similar well condensed informational materials that "set the facts straight" and helps dispel moralism, dogmatism, delusions and modern weaknesses that pollute the white race. Me personally between this, Nietszche and Siege i think will help shape ones inner world adequately enough to start to effect this outer clown world. Also i might say i think people are naturally self preserving above all things and your security extends to those close to you as extension of yourself (Family, Confidants, Race [race being the most immediate]). in that respect most people would be considered good by our modern moral systems but other dynamics of these systems have been used against the very peoples that fomented them (whites understanding the necessity of community for survival) and they must be reinterpreted changed or dropped. Moral systems serve a people not the other way around, you do it the other way around you get cucked by other races that will fuck your shit up. We need less romans and more Gauls. Our ancestors were barbarous because thats what was required. I feel population densities even homogeneous ethnic populations can aid in this disaster too. People werent meant to know too many other people, the highest qualities of life take place for those in small sustainable communities.
for the anons showing up still doubting or on the fence. this book will gear you up for war and get your head straight. christianity, big cities, universalism have cucked us we know but we need to see how exactly and totaly eviscerate all aspects of these mental habits. like howd we go from legendary giants to soyboys for fucks sake? domestication.
Might Is Right - Ragnar Redbeard
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gppaJq2ibyI&t=10784s
OP - https://8ch.net/pol/res/13226711.html
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 18406361? ago
nice post especially the kin selection reference. i see entirely what youre saying individuals being instances of a gene but i feel its a two way road. the gene needs to adapt for more survivable instances in the process. we get in a false dichotomy to a degree with collectives and individuals when they are bipartisan forces of one process. in our genetic instances currently weve taken on some debilitating traits for overall survivability and this itself may be an ebb and flow "morphogenetic" cycle to ultimately breed better instances. so what im saying is in a time of weakness in the face of collapsing societies and traditions where those in your genetic family are ultimately self destructive one would have to incorporate elements of hedonism and even anarchy. if our collective is weak in certain elements itll breed other elements to clean it out like antibodies. this is played out in individual instances as conquerers historically it seems. but again satanic anything is kind of uncreative garbage.
[–] 18406367? ago
Interesting take. However, those best able to protect the ability of a group to survive and reproduce have traditionally been rewarded by access to reproduction. Women are evolved to desire these traits, because they allow kin selection to function without succumbing to the issues you describe. I would even say that ensuring men are selected for on this basis is a large part of what constitutes "culture". I do see merit in your dualistic take and I agree that there is room for competition within a group as long as it does not jeopardize the unity of a group.