Revolutionary right-wing Intersectonality
"Intersectionality" represents an analytic framework that attempts to identify how interlocking systems of power impact those who are most marginalized in society. Intersectionality considers that various forms of social stratification, such as class, race, sexual orientation, age, religion, creed, disability and gender, do not exist separately from each other but are woven together. While the theory began as an exploration of the oppression of women of color within society, today the analysis is potentially applied to all social categories, including social identities usually seen as dominant when considered independently.
https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersectionality
The time has come to develop what I call right-wing intersectionality against the Judeo-egalitarian tyranny.
It consists in triggering or exacerbating racial, ethnic, religious, sexual and religious tensions everywhere and all the time, thus making this degenerate society totally ungovernable by Jews and, more generally, all the enemies of the heterosexual white man.
This new approach offers almost unlimited possibilities.
Excite hijab supporters against faggots and feminists, Arab slave traders against niggers, black evangelists against afro-feminists, white leftists against brown males of the Caliphate, seculars against religious, etc…
The first goal is to strengthen inequality as a social foundation by fueling racism, anti-Semitism, male supremacy and any form of organic hierarchy.
Any hierarchy is based on the pure balance of power, that is, the ability to exercise domination through coercion by one's enemies. Since the racial potential of white men is by definition superior to that of our enemies, any paradigm shift based on the exercise of brute force and the thirst for domination works in our favor.
The egalitarian mentality, which is actually a thirst for subordination of the strong by the weak, must be destroyed to unleash the Aryan potential. Submitting the enemy is not only essential but must be consciously sought.
Then, it is a matter of strategically neutralizing the enemies by stirring up hatred between the most enemy sociological components by playing on all their differences and determinisms.
Finally, it is a question of forcing the white masses to withdraw into themselves by defensively adopting anti-egalitarian, anti-universalist and ethno-differentialists reflexes in their daily lives. In short, to extricate it from their egalitarian individualism that prevents them from thinking of themselves as a united racial group.
This cocktail will make it possible to collapse Judeo-individualist democracy by actively participating in the destruction of society for the benefit of irreducible socio-biological subentities.
The interest of right-wing intersectionality is that it is nourished by left-wing intersectionality, which is based on allogenic tribalism and sexual communitarianism instrumentalized by the Jews, but to make it more impossible to create a unified anti-white front under Jewish leadership.
It is a promising weapon in the arsenal of white racism. As we are seeing, for example, with the case of Ilhan Omar in the US.
This approach radically breaks with the reactionary approach of defending the current system at all costs on the pretext that it is at least the cultural product of Westerners to the detriment of non-natives.
It is an illusion: this system can only be maintained by devitalizing the white man. It is doomed to destruction.
The more open the balkanization is, the sooner the confrontation with our racial enemies will take place. And time, for us, is essential given the demographic imperative.
Keeping this Jewish system under artificial respiration on the grounds that old boomers want to be able to retire before the racial cataclysm is not an acceptable argument. Wanting to save yesterday's degeneration in order to try to delegitimize the one that is already in place today either.
Those who are afraid of confrontation are those who have something to lose. Only our enemies have anything to lose.
The white race, whose youth is eternal collectively, has everything to gain.
O my brothers, am I then cruel? But I say: What falls, that shall one also push!
Everything of today- it falls, it decays; who would preserve it! But I- I wish also to push it!
Know you the delight which rolls stones into precipitous depths?- Those men of today, see just how they roll into my depths!
A prelude am I to better players, O my brothers! An example! Do according to my example!
And him whom you do not teach to fly, teach I pray you- to fall faster!-
Thus Spake Zarathustra
https:// democratieparticipative.club/julia-la-fiotte-deguisee-en-femme-une-nouvelle-fois-insulte-par-des-males-marrons-agressifs-place-de-la-republique/
OP - https://8ch.net/pol/res/13108700.html
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 18453344? ago
"Intersectionality" is CultMarx realizing that ad hoc tribal grievance is inherently unstable, and trying to duct tape black nationalists and Islamists and feminists and Chicanos into a Katamari Damacy ball of political opportunism.
It's a dumb solution to a dumb problem.
Instead of repeating CultMarx insanity we should reject purity spiralling and accept people that are pretty much three-fourths on board. Dennis Prager is a Zionist and an apologist for the Talmud, but apart from that he's good. Peter Thiel is a homosexual but apart from that he's good. Look at the full spread of the Dark Enlightenment chart and recognize the true diversity.
[–] 18453347? ago
While to some extent, guarding against purity spiral is necessary, some of your proposals leave us back, ultimately, in the position we find ourselves. To truly satisfy what you describe, I would think pure sepratism would be necessary in the end, with a "I don't tread on you, you don't tread on me" kind of attitude between you and said Zionists, homosexuals, etc, except at a State level. Certainly that would be most preferable to satisfy the empathetic drive, but practically speaking I think it would just be a retreat and put anyone trying to save, or rebirth, the West in a position of weakness once again and simply allow them to be carved up once more in century's or several decades' time.
There is a reason for purity spiral and it is bore out of a desire to shore up points of weakness. Eventually you must declare the product safe, however. But if you consistently allow even small things, well, that's eventually how you get the MIGApedes. I don't think there's really a better, more textbook example. Malice is the wrong approach to take, I agree, but that doesn't mean those things falling outside of the window of acceptibility in such fundemental fashion should be tolerated within confines of said window, so to speak.