You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[–]17936324?0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
The Left: Removal or liquidation of Wealth, Class, and Hierarchy will resolve individual and inter-group conflicts. (Bolshevism)
The Right: Promoting the Individual, Personal Rights, and Free Enterprise will resolve individual and inter-group conflicts. (Capitalism)
The 3rd Position: Acknowledging individual and group differences are biological and inherent, thus promoting separation of groups solving inter-group conflicts.
It seems like everyone but the 3rd position is just trying to tweak the system instead of building a world where all people of all genetics can thrive, but this is just my outside normie perspective here. Am I on the right track here?
The political term right-wing was first used during the French Revolution, when liberal deputies of the Third Estate generally sat to the left of the president's chair, a custom that began in the Estates General of 1789. The nobility, members of the Second Estate, generally sat to the right. In the successive legislative assemblies, monarchists who supported the Old Regime were commonly referred to as rightists because they sat on the right side. A major figure on the right was Joseph de Maistre, who argued for an authoritarian form of conservatism. Throughout the 19th century, the main line dividing Left and Right in France was between supporters of the republic (often secularists) and supporters of the monarchy (often Catholics).[18] On the right, the Legitimists and Ultra-royalists held counter-revolutionary views, while the Orléanists hoped to create a constitutional monarchy under their preferred branch of the royal family, a brief reality after the 1830 July Revolution. The centre-right Gaullists in post-World War II France advocated considerable social spending on education and infrastructure development as well as extensive economic regulation, but limited the wealth redistribution measures characteristic of social democracy.[citation needed]
In British politics, the terms "right" and "left" came into common use for the first time in the late 1930s in debates over the Spanish Civil War.[27]
The Right has gone through five distinct historical stages: (I) the reactionary right sought a return to aristocracy and established religion; (II) the moderate right distrusted intellectuals and sought limited government; (III) the radical right favored a romantic and aggressive nationalism; (IV) the extreme right proposed anti-immigration policies and implicit racism; and (V) the neo-liberal right sought to combine a market economy and economic deregulation with the traditional right-wing beliefs in patriotism, elitism and law and order
Also look up Tories and Whigs
Original right - monarchists. Original left - libertarians. I am not sure if third position was even used by National socialists. It is nowdays used by National Bolsheviks and similar groups
[–]17936328?0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
building a world where all people of all genetics can thrive
Read Mein Kampf, the goal isn't to build a world where all people can thrive. The perspective of our world-views is our race and our race alone. All of our thoughts and actions start from this standpoint. Cucked bourgeois nationalism isn't particularistic but makes universalistic claims that "everyone should have a nation", while Hitler made the claim that the only thing that ultimately matters is forwarding the interests of the German people. This doesn't mean "hurr conquer everyone on the planet" of course, but is in line with social Darwinism and a view of history as the struggle for existence.
Capitalism and communism are both progressive materialist ideologies that were revolutionary against traditional tribe based economics. They are both left wing ideologies meant to undermine old social hierarchies. Only in the American context, where we are so far removed from traditional forms of governance, are communism and capitalism seen on opposite sides, because we're already operating outside of the old order in a left wing cultureless materialist atmosphere.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 17936324? ago
The Left: Removal or liquidation of Wealth, Class, and Hierarchy will resolve individual and inter-group conflicts. (Bolshevism)
The Right: Promoting the Individual, Personal Rights, and Free Enterprise will resolve individual and inter-group conflicts. (Capitalism)
The 3rd Position: Acknowledging individual and group differences are biological and inherent, thus promoting separation of groups solving inter-group conflicts.
It seems like everyone but the 3rd position is just trying to tweak the system instead of building a world where all people of all genetics can thrive, but this is just my outside normie perspective here. Am I on the right track here?
[–] 18416075? ago
please just try to get the basics
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_politics
Also look up Tories and Whigs
Original right - monarchists. Original left - libertarians. I am not sure if third position was even used by National socialists. It is nowdays used by National Bolsheviks and similar groups
[–] 18416076? ago
National socialists are third position.
[–] 17936328? ago
Read Mein Kampf, the goal isn't to build a world where all people can thrive. The perspective of our world-views is our race and our race alone. All of our thoughts and actions start from this standpoint. Cucked bourgeois nationalism isn't particularistic but makes universalistic claims that "everyone should have a nation", while Hitler made the claim that the only thing that ultimately matters is forwarding the interests of the German people. This doesn't mean "hurr conquer everyone on the planet" of course, but is in line with social Darwinism and a view of history as the struggle for existence.
[–] 17936327? ago
Capitalism isn't really hard right, the "3rd" position is further down the right side of the scale if you prefer to see politics that way.
[–] 17979288? ago
>>13091888
Capitalism and communism are both progressive materialist ideologies that were revolutionary against traditional tribe based economics. They are both left wing ideologies meant to undermine old social hierarchies. Only in the American context, where we are so far removed from traditional forms of governance, are communism and capitalism seen on opposite sides, because we're already operating outside of the old order in a left wing cultureless materialist atmosphere.