You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 18111559? ago 

When is the next walk?

Saturday, April 20th.

>>13148754

I dont really want to be in SF during 420, or any park for that matter.

Oh, good point. My OP was just picking out Saturdays, though I do know some people are celebrating a certain birthday instead on Saturday. It's really either-or I guess. The 22nd and 27th will be a return to normalcy I'm sure.

>>13148777

Pertinent trips.

0
0

[–] 18111563? ago 

What Time Local Time?? (U.S.)

0
0

[–] 18163003? ago 

What Time Local Time?? (U.S.)

Whatever your time zone is. There is no need to standardize.

>>13154198

Why am I not seeing museums here?

Just hasn't been a location mentioned yet. It will at some point I imagine since it's a good place to do things while looking around for anons.

>>13157834

Then make the determination yourself. The ambiguity is useful to decentralize the actual actions.

>>13162947

An important thing to realize for all anons is that we, the sane and normal people, are the silent majority.

Thanks for the encouragement, and excellent post. Anons are far from alone with these ideas, even among the general public. Those ideas just need to be articulated well.

>>13163097

If I could I would have archived the previous thread before starting this one, but I do not have moderator powers. Just in case any shills continue to accuse me of spamming.

>>13163154

Why must this thing be so complicated?

Opsec. That's the short answer. The longer answer is that it is a simplified trade-off between perfect anon security, which is never meeting up in real life or joining things found on this site, and becoming particularly vulnerable to honeypots, spying, and other forms that come from centralized public planning. Naming specific places on this kind of public board will greatly increase the odds you'll meet someone, but who that "someone" is becomes likewise increasingly uncertain. The older Walk threads worked with that specific locations meetup idea, and I disagreed with it because it seemed too risky. My formulation sacrifices some of the odds of meeting up in favor of better opsec for everyone who participates. It might not be the best formulation, but it certainly is the most secure way to meet an anon for both parties.

As for specific places, there may be ways to do that. One method would be to put up Walk posters with a particular locale area mentioned on them. Normal people won't know what that is and will not even notice them, while anons will know what it means and know someone has set up a Walk there. So long as that process was kept entirely offline it might be useful signalling. Or simply spreading Walk posters without locations on them will signal to any anons that there are other anons actively going on a Walk near them, and that might get some to commit to it.

It would need discussion, and maybe that will come about. But I err on the side of caution personally.