You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 17868061? ago 

Have you had any confirmations of a successful meet-up?

As much as is possible on an image board while maintaining good opsec. I've seen a number of reports of anons having met each other in Walk threads, which if true is promising. I know that I've run into anons around my area, and I can say that the most reliable way is to speak up about pertinent issues without going full power level on it. The last Saturday that I went out had some excellent conversations. I imagine that there are meetups that occur from lurkers who, despite being pleased about the results, don't say anything about it because they are lurkers. So I am optimistic.

>>13080270

Why are you trying to keep anons from networking?

Those who are legitimately cautious about IRL meetings are concerned about honeypots predominantly and to a lesser extent just believe it may be a waste of time or an embarrassing activity from what I can gather so far. With every legitimate concern the effort can be improved in terms of security and efficacy, so I appreciate that real feedback. The shilling and astroturfing is useful only in showing how agitating this idea is to those who don't like the idea of anons quietly organizing beyond their reach.

>>13080315

>>13080360

What happened to the thread about the "Volunteer Community Clean-Up Crew"?

That's an excellent idea, and one that I was thinking would be the sort of project anons could take on after making their local connections. It really does deserve its own thread since it's certain a few steps beyond the scope of this one.

>>13080403

I wonder why.

>>13080582

Good luck in sunny Florida!

0
0

[–] 17868063? ago 

This is three-point anon

>>13083211

Keep the community clean up on the back burner, don't start a thread just yet, think through it and make it simple and safe.

>>13083394

Noted.