You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 17840378? ago 

Or just shitpost nazi larping for the rest of your life.

0
0

[–] 17840383? ago 

>>13074067

no more larping, let's get serious!

whites shouldnt be afraid to meet other whites

b-but… why do we need to meet?

you know.. just to talk.. about guy things or whatever… get to know each other better, as men…

b-but… men dont just meet other dudes to "talk". That sounds faggy as fuck

so, you're a shitposting jewish nazi larper who is also a homophobe. Nice.

t. trust us, we're white

these meetup honeypot threads never get old. Please don't ever stop making them.

0
0

[–] 17840385? ago 

>>13073920

>>13068101

It's an interesting angle of attack. So previous Walk threads were basically attacked only with "muh honeypot" posts, which could at least point to the specifics about the specific city-location list and say, with some validity, that there was an opsec issue there. I supposed that with this new formulation those attacks would diminish, and for a time they did. "Muh honeypot" posts kept coming in, but obviously came from those who wouldn't, or couldn't, read the OP and understand it. Then the concerning trolling died down, as if regrouping and assessing, and then came the two new prongs of the attacks: Paranoia leveraging and negative association.

The paranoia stuff about drones, stalking, FBI infiltrators, and all that is meant only to frighten people enough to stop them from thinking any further. The negative association with some degeneracy (the posts claiming this is literally homosexual behavior) is meant to evoke disgust and revulsion in potential anons. I'm surprised the jew angle hasn't come up yet, but if these two strategies don't seem to work that will be among the next batch of attack angles used I wager.

My goal is very simple: Create a method that might benefit networking among the better elements of /pol/'s userbase without compromising their security in the process. There are only two kinds of camps against this idea: Those who believe it is a trap laid out for anons, and those that do not want anons to meet up. The former tend to engage in the topic with actual critiques of the process, while the latter spiral off into unrelated hysterics and attack vectors if and when their opening gambits fail. For anyone who has been on /pol/ for awhile, this is not unique to these threads.

Others have said it, but I think that the shilling and concern trolling on these threads has increased tremendously due to the fact that this Walk does not have an obvious weakness aside from logistics, which in the end is also its greatest protective feature. It is an idea that is extremely difficult to assail once people start doing it, and the only place to stop that activity would be at the bottleneck right here, on this board and in this thread. If an anon is convinced of this and practices good opsec as is constantly encouraged by the honest actors, there is no stopping them from that point forward. And that must be frightening to those who are compensated to stop the growth of redpilled networks.

0
0

[–] 17840384? ago 

We're not afraid of you.