You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 17797366? ago 

>>13068118

Do you expect OP to say anything different when you just keep spamming the same crap about honeypots while providing no substance to your argument?Pick another location than a city hall or just don't go at all if you're so concerned about biometrics. That simple.

0
0

[–] 17801215? ago 

I did - The meet packing plant parking lot

>>13068101

0
0

[–] 17801213? ago 

while providing no substance to your argument?

<PREPLANNED meeting places/times

and using, at best, dishonest counter-points like

<the feds wouldnt waste their time on this

<they dont have the money (as if sending a drone cost that much)

<anyone who is against my useless idea MUST be a shill

0
0

[–] 17801214? ago 

About the only genuine point brought up was preplanned places and times. But the only exact place is a city hall, which I'd say just about every anon is going to avoid. Parks are plentiful and vague enough.

<they dont have the money (as if sending a drone cost that much)

Drones do cost a lot

<anyone who is against my useless idea MUST be a shill

There's concerned anons sure, but the amount of one and done replies that consist of five word sentences or less tends to make people think they aren't genuine.

<the feds wouldnt waste their time on this

Cost vs actual benefit seems like they wouldn't, but again this isn't for planning to bomb buildings. This is just networking. Anons are hopefully smart enough to not fall for any fed-like suggestions.