You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 17790295? ago 

Or just wear a white coat.

sure, i'll buy a WHITE COAT just for you poor niggers

0
0

[–] 17790307? ago 

Or jacket. Or sweater. Or whatever. Might not even need a coat in some places.

>>13066139

>>13066206

>>13066217

Last thread had an OP for March dates, so this one was April dates. At the rate the last one was filling up I didn't believe it would have enough room for another month's worth of action. I liked the idea of having a general thread for each month, but we'll see how that goes.

>>13066298

First and only time to address "muh honeypot" posts: Read the Common Concerns listed below.

>>13066037

>>13066042

>>13066048

If anyone says "muh honeypot" without addressing those explanations and answers, they are a shill or an illiterate.

>>13066325

But considering how spread out /pol/ is and past experiences with these ideas, odds are you won't meet anyone.

Yes, the odds are heavily stacked against anons meeting on mere logistic grounds. It is however like Brownian Motion in that the small likelihood nonetheless, in aggregate, can result in some reactions. Anons have met one another through this method, and it takes just one meeting to forge a connection. More will meet if more will participate. And if all else fails, you had a nice time out of the way for a bit. Low risk, high reward.

They send out agents with a van, or maybe just a drone for surveillance.

Over what? And to find who? People in white shirts? Wearing hats? Talking about the nice weather or books? Joking? Act like a normal person, don't entertain conversations about illegal things, don't compromise your 100% plausible deniability that your outfit lends you, and you'll be pretty much untouchable as if you were at any other place during your day. The FBI doesn't give a shit about you to deploy agents to stalk you, and if you are so important you're already being stalked, and to think they'll get you if you try a Walk honestly is self-aggrandizing delusion.

inb4

I already posted your rebuttles before you even started. Now your argument shows itself to be weaker because you showed how little you actually read of this formulation. Nice gondola though.

>>13066535

It's really that easy.

i don't see a problem with this thread except i have friends irl who are /pol/ already

Well in that case you might see them doing the same thing, which could lead to interesting conversations. Or you could deploy as a group and cover more ground to meet more people. In any case if you've already got anons as friends that's great. Time for you all to work together to connect with your people and make your community a better place.

0
0

[–] 17793481? ago 

I already posted your rebuttles before you even started.

Your rebuttles are what I said, disingenous arguments.

<noooo the feds would never waste time to track anons

<they cant possibly monitor all these places/times that are PREPLANNED

So guess what. Due to your autismpossibly being a bot and fore mentioned disingenuous arguments, I'm going to spam these shit threads now

EVERYTIME