You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 17652449? ago 

The picture can still be used in a news report if it's some news about how on 8ch board some troll made an evil nazi drawing bu they can't use it for example as a piece of art to present an article.

If you make the drawing and some trannie uploads it to tumblr to get likes for your work, you can issue take down. Most important is where you upload first your original content, some sites will offer greater tools to prove that you own that image.

0
0

[–] 17652455? ago 

So can original content posted to 8chan by 8chan users be then sent to all other companies to add to their filters so it's exclusive to 8ch and will just get auto blocked if anyone tries to upload it elsewhere?

0
0

[–] 17652466? ago 

This mostly affects big websites that make a profit from original content.

So can original content posted to 8chan by 8chan users be then sent to all other companies to add to their filters so it's exclusive to 8ch and will just get auto blocked if anyone tries to upload it elsewhere?

Not really. You will have to use a more commercial site. If someone wanted 8ch content blocked from other websites, what would stop your from uploading content from others which will be added by some AI and blocked automatically on other websites?

You won't be able to prove that you own the rights to the content using 8ch unless they implement a better system.

It's more about commercial use, not censorship. It could be used to censor things but it would be difficult.

Article 13 replaces the "mere conduit" exemption from copyright infringement from for-profit "online content sharing service providers" with a new, conditional exemption to liability. These conditions are a claimed implementation of "effective and proportionate measures" to "prevent the availability of specific [unlicensed] works identified by rightsholders", acting "expeditiously" to remove them, and demonstrating that "best efforts" have been made to prevent their future availability. The article also extends any licenses granted to content hosts to their users, as long as those users are not acting "on a commercial basis".

Article 13b requires websites which "automatically reproduce or refer to significant amounts of copyright-protected visual works" to "conclude fair and balanced licensing agreements with any requesting rightholders"

0
0

[–] 17652460? ago 

no. You can file a complaint with the court of an eu member state of which the individual posting your copyrighted meme is from. Because of the law, if it ever get implemented, the court would have to involve the owners of the platform on which it got posted and you have hopefully 7 figures ready to pay for a decade long case about 50 cents