With the accelerationism ideology gaining ground on a variety of right-wing platforms and the newfound love of political violence among nationalists, as well as the increased tolerance of socialist policy among /pol/lards, it's time to re-evaluate the core tenets of modern extreme right movements.
collective self-rule
Anarchy is firstly defined as a rejection of government. Political anarchy is this same idea, but mended of its lack of order with the notion that self-rule is possible. For those that see national identity as their core collective, the idea of self rule (see: white nationalism) is very appealing when faced with a government that hates them. Most nationalistic systems proposed by right movements have this as their goal if not one of their base ideological building blocks.
insurrection
A class conflict fought between Jewish elites and the hard working class white man is a common theme on /pol/ at least. Several institutional methods have been proposed alongside this- forming fraternities or trade unions; developing a strong family bond- whatever the nature of these, they form an essential structure in the definition of insurrectionist anarchism in that these small groups will band together and never compromise with class enemies.
socially liberal pathos
Albeit decrying the degeneracies of modernity entailed by some 'freedoms', the basic idea that certain individual freedoms enhance the advancement of the collective as a whole still permeates right-wing movements. The hypocrisy on the statist left is 'no freedom may trample social agency'. In opposition, the ability to sneer and decide that there is no need to participate in interactions that seem harmful is ingrained in the rightist attitude- something many anarchists share.
OP - https://8ch.net/pol/res/13021330.html
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 17629757? ago
>>13021485