With the accelerationism ideology gaining ground on a variety of right-wing platforms and the newfound love of political violence among nationalists, as well as the increased tolerance of socialist policy among /pol/lards, it's time to re-evaluate the core tenets of modern extreme right movements.
collective self-rule
Anarchy is firstly defined as a rejection of government. Political anarchy is this same idea, but mended of its lack of order with the notion that self-rule is possible. For those that see national identity as their core collective, the idea of self rule (see: white nationalism) is very appealing when faced with a government that hates them. Most nationalistic systems proposed by right movements have this as their goal if not one of their base ideological building blocks.
insurrection
A class conflict fought between Jewish elites and the hard working class white man is a common theme on /pol/ at least. Several institutional methods have been proposed alongside this- forming fraternities or trade unions; developing a strong family bond- whatever the nature of these, they form an essential structure in the definition of insurrectionist anarchism in that these small groups will band together and never compromise with class enemies.
socially liberal pathos
Albeit decrying the degeneracies of modernity entailed by some 'freedoms', the basic idea that certain individual freedoms enhance the advancement of the collective as a whole still permeates right-wing movements. The hypocrisy on the statist left is 'no freedom may trample social agency'. In opposition, the ability to sneer and decide that there is no need to participate in interactions that seem harmful is ingrained in the rightist attitude- something many anarchists share.
OP - https://8ch.net/pol/res/13021330.html
Sort: Top
[–] 17629758? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Room temperature IQ. It doesn't matter what kind of label you put on the new form of government which will serve the interest of Europeans. Respecting individual freedoms or having a thriving economy is even secondary (if a Western government is truly serving the interests of its people, then the country will be prosperous no matter what).
We are under attack, plain and simple, and winning this war is a matter of survival. If we do not fight, then our people will vanish completely, other than small irrelevant and impoverished communities. Left, right, anarchism, statism, whatever. We are long past the point of discussing political systems.
[–] 17629751? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
STOP
Stop calling this shit "far right" or "extreme right" politics.
It's not.
It's fucking normal human politics not bastardized by jewish, satanic bullshit.
[–] 17629756? ago
This is actually a point people need to start getting clear in their head. Our position is not a radical one. Infact, throughout history we would have been seen as quite tame and timid. We are a traditional and normal position.
[–] 17629750? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Much like national socialism has nothing to do with (((socialism))), standing up and defending our interests has nothing to do with your shitty marxist (((accelerationism))) ideology, even if some anons use the word "accelerationism." I see lefty shills like dogs trying to purposely play words games and mislead anons into your shitty marxist / anarchist version of this, but nobody is buying it no matter how hard you keep shilling it.
[–] 17629748? ago
Any ideology that seeks to reject the state is pretty suspect, as the state is the organizing body of the nation. People who advocate for anarchism are just childish retards who are afraid of any authority, discipline or organization. Who will build roads? Who will defend the nation? Who will ensure that degenerates aren’t allowed to run free? Anarchism would be even more open to Jewish subversion than democracy is.
[–] 17629757? ago
>>13021485
[–] 17629747? ago
hurr durr Mussolini was an anarchist because he marched on rome against the government.
Idiots like you OP deserve a mercy bullet to the head.
[–] 17629753? ago
>>13021398
I never equated fascism to anarchism. But in Mussolini's own words
The fascist belief system requires, essentially, blind devotion to the faith that the State is actually working towards the fulfillment of the nation's spiritual essence. It will in similar fashion become outmoded or be co-opted like other religious institutions. It also requires the punishment of heresies as a result, otherwise the faith is society can become compromised- compromising the State itself.
[–] 17629739? ago
It's organic as shit, no one believes in that. OP IS A FAG.
[–] 17629745? ago
Actually, most revolutionary anons above a certain IQ have understood the importance of accelerationism. Screaming and crying about it was never an argument.
Accelerationists just had better arguments and better logic.
Get with the times, boomer.
[–] 17629740? ago
INORGANIC
[–] 17629737? ago
Unlike the children who get triggered over wordism, I don't really care that much about what I am called. Only what is the result of my struggle against the jew. But I will address some points you make.
I reject (((government)))
Just government is fine. But (((government))) is evil and should be overthrown.
This is less of a "class" struggle than a racial one. Class is just a made up construct that can be defined and redefined to suit whatever brainlet ideology you want. Most Americans think they're middle class. Thus, class is entirely a perception.
Race on the otherhand is real and colours all facets of life.
Yeah man.
[–] 17629727? ago
Fuck off, you dumb faggot. Fascism is the only way to correct the current state of the west.
[–] 17629754? ago
Fascism is stupid, very corruptible. Anarchist National Socialism, bitch.
[–] 17629755? ago
[–] 17629735? ago
Regurgitating an elite class into a new system seems like the path towards despotism. Unless you manage to annihilate all racial enemies the fundamentals of fascism will inevitably fail to protect the race.
>>13021348
Many anarchists are actually federalists since that is the least coercive form of organization over a large scale. If you think about democracy also being self-rule, then the Americans were very anarchist until the Articles were taken down.
[–] 17629743? ago
Yes, no shitskins or kikes will be allowed to participate in politics (that includes voting).
And anarchy will? I'd love to hear the logic behind that one…
[–] 17629728? ago
<LETS GIVE THE GOVERNMENT UNLIMITED POWER!
Nigger, fascism isn't going to solve anything. Guns are going to solve our problems, then we can sort out whatever comes after that when we get there.
[–] 17629732? ago
yet another retard that doesn't understand the endgame
/leftypol/ really needs to stay in its containment board
[–] 17629730? ago
<LETS GIVE THE GOVERNMENT UNLIMITED POWER
I'm talking about fascism after the current government has either been taken over by a coup/revolution or gradually infiltrated over time.