You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 17523898? ago 

I fully agree. However, I would like to create some kind of ideological basis first. Itried this earlier, but the thread died so here I go again. One of the most frustrating things is that we all know what Accelerationism generally means, or refers to, but it doesn't seem to exist in the world of literature, at least in the way we use that term.

So I have taken the libery, autism, to read up some books, papers and definitions of what the term Accelerationism means, and compiled it. Afterwards, I tried to add a definition that bottles what pol thinks and how it works. However, "How to accelerate" will be a topic of its own.

I am not entirely done yet, but I would gladly appreciate some feedback to this preliminary draft. For the lack of better terminology, and greater distinction, I have dubbed this strand "National-Accelerationism" (6 Minute reading time)

https://media.8ch.net/file_store/d9e25ff34772bca56ca6277aa25b78745cbf355e825489356f5c61b62f020a15.pdf

0
0

[–] 17544916? ago 

This is amazin'

This is old/pol/ tier material.

We wuz academics.

0
0

[–] 17544919? ago 

Thank you very much. I feel there needs to be a further distinction between passive (peaceful,resistant) and active (violent, offensive) accelerationism.

Additionally, it should further elaborate how the west will fail one way or another, even if no "violent outbreak" of some sort occours.