Anon Archived So it seems obvious that Tarrant was full-on 14 but not 88. (8chan)
submitted ago by 3108649?
Posted by: 3108649?
Posting time: 1.7 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 6/19/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 49
SCP: 1
1 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
Anon Archived So it seems obvious that Tarrant was full-on 14 but not 88. (8chan)
submitted ago by 3108649?
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 17599570? ago
And they rejected them for an "alliance" with Hitler to attack Poland.
What exactly was the point you were trying to convey?
I'm sure you're a former special ops super-soldier with over 300 confirmed kills.
Somehow I suspect your military education comes mostly from videogames.
Poland did and Germany crushed them in the early phases of the war. Can you come up with one reason why Germany and Poland could not have stopped them again?
Bigger =/= better.
Alright then. What do you claim was the reason for the invasion?
[–] 17599572? ago
>>13010770
Britain and France actively sought an alliance with Soviet Union for the explicit purpose of attacking Germany
The Soviets were no dummies, Stalin the least with his spies in the British government.
Of course did Stalin know that the British plan was to pit Germany against the SU. That was no secret, that was published by all communist media of the time. Mkay?
The point is Britain and France sought war with Germany before Germany was at war with Poland, the alleged reason British and French declaration of war.
Another point is that while Poland was “invited” in the alliance against Germany, it was expect from Poland to let in the Soviet for the attack against Germany. Poland polity refused.
So anyway you look at it, your “peace loving” British, French cabal was lusting to go to war with Germany.
The Red Army of the civil war era was primitive equipped, while Poland had for the time modern French arms, still they barely could stop them. That is the reason the Poles talk of the “Miracle on the Vistula”.
When they hadn’t fully mobilized and were ready.
Only an idiot would wait for his enemy to marshal his whole strength to attack.
Your right, my speciality is detecting bull shit before stepping in.
Oh the old jewish tactic to repeat the already answered question.
The reason for Germany to go to war with Poland were Poland's continued and permanent aggression in addition to Poland occupying large tracts of Germany.
[–] 17599579? ago
Why'd they let him annex the Sudetenland then? Or Memel or Austria or Saarland or the Rhineland?
See, you're ignoring the fact that trying to fight a war that your public doesn't understand is risky. It's important to make the public feel that their cause is righteous. It's a tough sell to say that German land should not be in Germany. But why should Polish land be in Germany? Especially after what happened to Czechia.
Would you trust a man who annexed a nation after promising not to do so in exchange for X-majority land returned to his nation?
I wouldn't.
FIghting their way through Poland would have given Germany plenty of time to prepare AND ensured that they were viewed by all as the defenders of Europe from communism rather than an imperialist monster trying to steal everyone's land.
You must hate Otto Von Bismark.
Considering that Bismark united Germany and defeated France, I'd say he knew more about diplomacy and war than you.
Germany was aggressive to Poland. Should Poland have invaded?
And this I think is your real reason for disliking Poland so much. I suspect that you're one of those people that believe that all the land that Prussia conquered in the 19th century should be German again despite the clear Polish majority. Though please do prove me wrong.
Danzig was German. No question. But most of the rest of western Poland was Polish majority.
If it's wrong for Czechs to rule German majority Sudetenland, it is wrong for Germans to rule Polish lands.
Hitler claimed that he only wanted to bring all German lands into a united Germany. I hold him to his word.