Anon Archived So it seems obvious that Tarrant was full-on 14 but not 88. (8chan)
submitted ago by 3108649?
Posted by: 3108649?
Posting time: 1.7 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 6/19/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 48
SCP: 1
1 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
Anon Archived So it seems obvious that Tarrant was full-on 14 but not 88. (8chan)
submitted ago by 3108649?
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 17524999? ago
lmao, what are you doing on this board commie shit? Back to leftypol scum.
>>12989858
True, but its a pretty clear assumption if you know about Stalin and the end goals of Communism - which is world revolution. He had different views from Trotsky, but it is pretty clear that he wanted to attack germans, only Hitler got ahead of him and fucked his plan totally up. That's why he probably spent many days in his room in isolation, because his plan just got totally fucked up. Read Stalin's biography, read the victor suvorov book, read about stalin's problems with trotsky and this should be sufficient for you to come to the same conclusion as I did.
I'm not sure what you mean. He had war with both of these countries.
[–] 17526591? ago
no. there are 2 implementation of communism. you have stalin implementation that is national socialism. and you have (jewish) lenin/trotsky implementation that is world communism (or globalism if you want)
no, it is not. oil and raw materials were flowwing through boarders to germany almost till start of attack. why would stalin give hitler oil and raw materials if he wanted to attack them ? and all that at the time when germany was under embargo. he could have just stooped trading with germany and wait. he actively supported struggle of german people
you have come to wrong conclusion.
stalin had problems with trotsky because trotsky want global revolution. do you understand now ?
[–] 17526604? ago
No it is in no way national socialism, it is national communism at best. Communists don't care about race/culture, that is the BASIC principle of national socialism. They care about classes.
Because he wanted Hitler to clear out western european forces, then he could wage war against Hitler and appear as a liberator against a weak army.
Nope, they both wanted global revolution. It was only that trotsky was a moron who wanted to wage constant war, but stalin was smarter and he understood that soviet union had to make peace with baltics/poland/etc in order to regroup its strength. In that 20 years he built up soviet industry and turnt it from an agrarian country into a industrial one. But trotsky didn't want to make this break, he wanted to keep on fighting, but that would've ended in communist loss. The end goal for Stalin was always world revolution, only when Hitler attacked him in 1941, then that dream broke. But there are some evidences that he wanted to start a war in 1953-1955, but thankfully he died before he could do it.