Anon Archived So it seems obvious that Tarrant was full-on 14 but not 88. (8chan)
submitted ago by 3108649?
Posted by: 3108649?
Posting time: 1.7 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 6/19/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 47
SCP: 1
1 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
Anon Archived So it seems obvious that Tarrant was full-on 14 but not 88. (8chan)
submitted ago by 3108649?
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 17524948? ago
It's more complicated than that. Hitler did a lot of good things for his nation, like revitalizing the economy, preserving their cultural traditions, and ending central banking practices. Churchill is on record saying that he was going to force Hitler into a war one way or another. Also the Nazis effectively stopped the USSR from spreading further east and taking over more of western Europe which wouldn't have been good.
[–] 17524981? ago
He sent an entire generation of his countrymen to kill his fellow whites.
[–] 17524998? ago
Don't we forget the glorious shaboos goyim of the finest generation!
[–] 17524984? ago
You don't know much about history do you.
He had to attack the soviets, because soviets would've attacked him. This is fact if you have read about Stalin and his personality and outlook on things. Read "The icebreaker" by victor suvorov.
Secondly the allied forces, Hitler gave many chances for brits to make peace. He liked anglos and thought they shouldn't be at war. Only churchill was a full on kike and did everything to destroy him.