Anon Archived So it seems obvious that Tarrant was full-on 14 but not 88. (8chan)
submitted ago by 3108649?
Posted by: 3108649?
Posting time: 1.7 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 6/19/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 47
SCP: 1
1 upvotes, 0 downvotes (100% upvoted it)
Anon Archived So it seems obvious that Tarrant was full-on 14 but not 88. (8chan)
submitted ago by 3108649?
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 17520113? ago
Personally 88 holds us back, if we just went 14, more would join.
Going full 88 will be a natural move later, for some.
If we had a good 14 base (dislikers) and allow some to progress to 88 (haters) - that would be ideal.
The 14's would be our comrades in arms if needed.
[–] 18399459? ago
Hitler says in Mein Kampf, and I forget where, that one zealot is worth ten followers. Your post gets this thought correct, appeal to many, and the zealots will rise to the top -> meaning going full 88.
It's likely Earnest went from lurking different chans, to lurking here and going full 88
[–] 18399461? ago
Yup you need at least 10% of the population in order to pull it off to.
[–] 18214358? ago
(((Optics))) are what brought us to this centrist boomer hellscape in the first place, no one acted to stop it worrying that’s they would seem like an extremist. Now look where this brought us
[–] 18214982? ago
Buzzwords won't change false flags to anything else.
https://media.8ch.net/file_store/d0cc2b5be8b8ef86a06df2bf4189d04e288e1a527f3eb5897fbf218c3f68a08b.pdf
[–] 18214359? ago
This is so reddit
[–] 17848989? ago
Fuck off alt-kiker.
[–] 17849008? ago
saved
[–] 17556248? ago
I agree.