You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[–]17412696?0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
Did you not read his manifesto? He said exactly what he was doing. At this stage we have no idea if he was right or not, but his logic was as follows:
White countries are quickly becoming non-white due to demographic warfare. White people are not waking up to the threats that are all about them. As such he wanted to accelerate the whole process. As such he targeted muslims, a people known for their violent ways, because he knew that by doing so there would be guaranteed revenge attacks. If he had targeted jews there would be no revenge attacks, it would simply be condemned internationally and be forgotten as a 'neo-nazi terrorist attack'. By attacking muslims instead of jews he ensures that the violence will escalate. As muslims continue to murder white people, more white people will turn to violence to protect their people. Everything will continue to escalate forcing the common apathetic man to choose a side. Eventually the facade of civility will fall and the war will begin in earnest.
In his view that is the best way to save white lands. It is easy to understand why he didn't target the jews or mention them all that much, he was trying to provoke muslims because he knows that their actions are what are waking up most white people. The jews are too intelligent and cowardly to openly do anything, and so demonising them just discredits him in the eyes of the masses. Its also not like the muslims are innocent, he cited myriad occasions where islam has attacked the West including many recent horrors such as Rotherham and Ebba's death.
Again, I'm not saying he's right to pursue accelerationism, but its obvious what he was trying to do. He outright tells us in his manifesto.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 17412696? ago
Did you not read his manifesto? He said exactly what he was doing. At this stage we have no idea if he was right or not, but his logic was as follows:
White countries are quickly becoming non-white due to demographic warfare. White people are not waking up to the threats that are all about them. As such he wanted to accelerate the whole process. As such he targeted muslims, a people known for their violent ways, because he knew that by doing so there would be guaranteed revenge attacks. If he had targeted jews there would be no revenge attacks, it would simply be condemned internationally and be forgotten as a 'neo-nazi terrorist attack'. By attacking muslims instead of jews he ensures that the violence will escalate. As muslims continue to murder white people, more white people will turn to violence to protect their people. Everything will continue to escalate forcing the common apathetic man to choose a side. Eventually the facade of civility will fall and the war will begin in earnest.
In his view that is the best way to save white lands. It is easy to understand why he didn't target the jews or mention them all that much, he was trying to provoke muslims because he knows that their actions are what are waking up most white people. The jews are too intelligent and cowardly to openly do anything, and so demonising them just discredits him in the eyes of the masses. Its also not like the muslims are innocent, he cited myriad occasions where islam has attacked the West including many recent horrors such as Rotherham and Ebba's death.
Again, I'm not saying he's right to pursue accelerationism, but its obvious what he was trying to do. He outright tells us in his manifesto.