You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 17281523? ago 

The Right values excellence

individuals carrying out mostly ineffective lone wolf attacks as we have seen

People on the right are so excellent they don't pick good targets

If people on the right were actual committing attacks you'd know, or rather you'd feel it. Most likely they'd be covered up as something benign to prevent them from sparking anything more just like what happened when a militia targeted the electrical infrastructure in Paradise, California last year.

0
0

[–] 17282695? ago 

Picking "good targets" isn't an activity that exists in a vacuum. You need to:

Gather reliable intelligence on the enemy

Analyze their systems and networks

Identify key stakeholders

Analyze effects those stakeholders have

Project effects neutralizing stakeholders will have on systems and networks

Weigh different options and their cost/risk/benefits/plausability

Gather intelligence on stakeholder that will make intervention possible (residences, work places, schedules, security, and those of others in close proximity/relationships with stakeholder)

Plan and practice for intervention

Execute intervention in a manner that allows you to repeat

All of this requires cooperation and coordination denied to us by an artificially maintained leadership vacuum. Like I said though, and part of the Left's strategy, there are inherently no "good targets". No matter who the individual kills or what he destroys, another Leftist will slide in from the shadowy mass of their collective psychosis to fill the departed agent/s' space, another corporate think tank office. The latter is harder to replace however.

High value targets at this point are infrastructure networked Leftists have invested in, a good deal of their effort is locked in tangible assets and institutions that they use to mass produce their horizontally distributed power base. The game would be to destroy these consistently in a low cost and repeatable way.