You can login if you already have an account or register by clicking the button below.
Registering is free and all you need is a username and password. We never ask you for your e-mail.
[–]17234773?0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
You should at least post a pdf of the article you supply. I'm not supplying the article though since I don't think it's worth the time for people on this site to read and I think if you do not have an academic background you might waste an unneeded amount of time to scan that stuff through.
The key pointers from the article are:
ethics surrounding design of AI biomarkers (facial recognition), surveillance technologies
power structures that would rise from the way it is implemented
laws that should be made to prevent this stuff
The EU made a panel of 52 university profs recently beginning of januari this year (2019) to make up a documents for ethics guidelines for the EU's AI projects that it wants to finance. EU made a lot more budget available for AI projects due to the hype and perceived usefulness of upcoming implementations of AI technology. This is by the way great if you're a researcher or got a business centered around AI because it means if you know the right people, you can easily get 500k-2mil funding from the EU. The EU is very corrupt in this regard there is plenty of tax payer money available to give to utter bullshit projects. You should for the lols search on cordis (website that contains all the EU projects along with the budget allocated to the project) and find some gems among it. A lot of big sounding projects around AI are up there that will never yield results that are to be desired because the often statistical work done before it shows no correlations for improvement. For example I saw research regarding usage of AI to give students appropiate exercises in an online environment to stimulate them. Such trials have already been tried with very decent educational software and didn't show statistical differences in performance over non AI users. So I'm puzzled why such a project would receive a lot of funding.
As for the whole ethics aspect yes it's an on going thing and yes I am aware of the work being done and the plotting of pushing an agenda. Clearly these leadership organs and commissions are being launched in advance of developing an agenda. However it's not entirely in line with just social justice, they're kind of trying to figure out what kind of laws can work that won't result in massive exploitation by companies. However I think the end result would just be companies getting limited in what they legally can do while governments which are controlled by kikes are getting monopolies and lead to oppression of citizenry anyway.
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 17234773? ago
You should at least post a pdf of the article you supply. I'm not supplying the article though since I don't think it's worth the time for people on this site to read and I think if you do not have an academic background you might waste an unneeded amount of time to scan that stuff through.
The key pointers from the article are:
The EU made a panel of 52 university profs recently beginning of januari this year (2019) to make up a documents for ethics guidelines for the EU's AI projects that it wants to finance. EU made a lot more budget available for AI projects due to the hype and perceived usefulness of upcoming implementations of AI technology. This is by the way great if you're a researcher or got a business centered around AI because it means if you know the right people, you can easily get 500k-2mil funding from the EU. The EU is very corrupt in this regard there is plenty of tax payer money available to give to utter bullshit projects. You should for the lols search on cordis (website that contains all the EU projects along with the budget allocated to the project) and find some gems among it. A lot of big sounding projects around AI are up there that will never yield results that are to be desired because the often statistical work done before it shows no correlations for improvement. For example I saw research regarding usage of AI to give students appropiate exercises in an online environment to stimulate them. Such trials have already been tried with very decent educational software and didn't show statistical differences in performance over non AI users. So I'm puzzled why such a project would receive a lot of funding.
As for the whole ethics aspect yes it's an on going thing and yes I am aware of the work being done and the plotting of pushing an agenda. Clearly these leadership organs and commissions are being launched in advance of developing an agenda. However it's not entirely in line with just social justice, they're kind of trying to figure out what kind of laws can work that won't result in massive exploitation by companies. However I think the end result would just be companies getting limited in what they legally can do while governments which are controlled by kikes are getting monopolies and lead to oppression of citizenry anyway.