You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

0
0

[–] 17144496? ago 

That's why I am positive that we could potentially win this culture war and take back our nation without firing a shot

This "study"—if it has any value at all—shows us what's working, why, and how, and lights a path toward further "normiefication".

While activity on the origin, 4chan, quickly dwindled, the results suggest platforms like YouTube might function as “bridge platforms” that bring the conspiracy to a wider audience online.

From this, we can infer that so-called "bridge" media (YouTube, Twitter, Facebook) are the crucial link between us and the mainstream.

Circling back to OP's >>12872306 proposition

My suggestion is this: We need to start learning to and striving to create pro-white entertaining content for our youth

it's clear that we need to disseminate our ideology on more accessible platforms. Obviously, censorship is a problem that leads to two possibilities:

soften the message to avoid censorship

make our own platforms

The latter is somewhat impractical, so I'm soliciting ideas on how to weaponize these studies to create our own "bridge" content.

Here's an archived mirror of the study.

http://salhagen.nl/dmi19/normiefication

http://archive.is/ZvgTG

0
0

[–] 17144499? ago 

I didn't need some gay study to know all this

0
0

[–] 17145409? ago 

I didn't need some gay study to know all this

That's precisely the point—each of us has an intuitive understanding of

what makes an effective meme

how memes spread organically

I'm suggesting we conduct our own "study" that fully articulates what we all know in order to create a roadmap to

>>12872306

create pro-white entertaining content for our youth

While I'm brainstorming impractical ideas, it may even behoove us to create a programme/meme assembly line/formal distribution network that governs

meme creation

meme distribution

tailored to each platform (censorship, audience, format).

Anons have plenty of Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube sockpuppets, but there's no "bridge" between /pol/ and those platforms. Imagine a loosely organized network that pushes modified content from /pol/ to our own Facebook groups, Twitter accounts, and YouTube channels. (Obviously, those platforms require some PR to avoid censorship and appeal to redpillable normalfags, but there'd be specific guidelines on translating content for certain media and audiences.)

This is all very abstract and underdeveloped, but intuition tells me that >>12875186 this study can be used to

create effective content

customize content for individual platforms

saturate the internet with propaganda

create a vertical /pol/ monopoly on ideas

It can't all be full 1488, but any neutral or conservative content that replaces progressive kike propaganda would be an improvement.

inb4 "just wait for Goebbels, goy; it's has to be all or nothing; gradualism is a waste of time"

>>12875298

Teach your children to respect their body, respect their mind, to enjoy science, to enjoy finding meaning, to enjoy becoming stronger and more skillful, and to enjoy their life.

Agreed, anon. In my above scenario, we would create /SIG/, /fit/, and /ethics/ content for the normie platforms like YouTube.

No labels need to be attached to truth

One can promote National Socialist values without using 'isms.

These channels etc already exists, but we should forge a direct path between us and them.

OP >>12872306 is any of this helpful in terms of providing a method for achieving what you're suggesting?