Anon Archived ANTISEMETIC CONTENT ON REDDIT GETTING THOUSANDS OF UPVOTES TO THE FRONT PAGE (8chan)
submitted ago by 3038942?
Posted by: 3038942?
Posting time: 1.8 years ago on
Last edit time: never edited.
Archived on: 5/17/2019 10:00:00 AM
Views: 240
SCP: 10
12 upvotes, 2 downvotes (86% upvoted it)
Anon Archived ANTISEMETIC CONTENT ON REDDIT GETTING THOUSANDS OF UPVOTES TO THE FRONT PAGE (8chan)
submitted ago by 3038942?
view the rest of the comments →
[–] 16821629? ago
This is why I gave up on leftism a long time ago. Instead of loving (((Zionism))) like ZOGbot neocons they instead love (((Marxism))). Ever since the (((Soviet Union))) was a thing, after WWII ended they created this divide and conquer strategy as Zionism being bad while Marxism being "good". It's a Jew vs. Jew scenario, and it's makes me sick how these leftist turds don't see it. The Soviet Union would have sent all of these degenerates to the Gulag just for being feminists, literal faggots and internationalists fuggin's baste amirite goy?". But with all that, they think suddenly think "leftism" back in the day was exactly like their "leftism". There's nothing revolutionary about supporting these degeneracies, it's about as neoliberal as it gets. So in that case, go choke on a dragon dildo, r/Socialism.
At the end of the day, they "hate" Israel for being a "White racist colonialist apartheid". Why indirectly blame Whites for what kikes are doing? Because it's part of their conditioning. Their true goal in life is to see every White individual killed off by radicalized non-Whites. They may criticize Israel, but as soon as you tell them that Jews control the media and the evil of the Talmud, they suddenly cower in fear and say "Oy vey! Why so anti-Semitic, goy! There are good Jews out there, trust me! I'm a good Jew!".
This is Lenin's quote on homosexuality, if you showed this to r/Socialism right now, they'll ban you:
Lenin died being a multiculturalism-loving, Talmudic kike degenerate as expected, but compared to commies now, he was Literally Hitler™. :^)
[–] 16822100? ago
Also, I have never seen a single leftist or commie in my life ever call out the Rothschilds or the Rockafellars, beyond calling all of them (((capitalists))), as if it makes a difference other than being a kosher statement. I've never seen them call out the majority Jewish MSM, either. Instead they call it "(((corporate media)))". Again, there's no difference other than being kosher about it. Their idea of "(((corporate media)))" is very warped, too. They think it's a pro-White monopoly hellbent on "oppressing" every single shitskins alive in the US. If they really wanted a revolution, they would have stormed right through the White House and into the Federal Reserve. They're pro-gun, aren't they? With the "Under no pretext" Marx quote and all. Leftism isn't real, it's just something several weaklings have created throughout history to justify their weakness, decadence, and their hatred for mother nature as their "strength".
[–] 16837642? ago
The Rockefellers were Saxon, as were the Vanderbilts. The Jews have been happy to work with elite whites that don't have qualms about doing their part in harming whites so long as they get continued access for privileged insider status that the Jews provide **being, as the case is, that Jews have been moneylenders for centuries now, preying on the Europeans and the Americans since they coined the practice of private central reserve banking to control interest rates, monetary policy and charge interest on Federal Reserve Notes, such that now even the banking clans of northern Italy and the hidden Chinese aristocrats like the Li family, a hanger-on from the Imperial era, are intermarrying with them (e.g. Aldobrandini-Rothschild marriage).
>>12809907
This would be better without the music overlaid.
>>12810182
Whilst crudely presented there, I do think that the philosophical questions of why there is something rather than nothing and how nothing could possibly spontaneously birth something without some other variable are valid in any case. Perhaps in the most epistemologically distant regions of the mind, there is a thing that we may call god, then. This need not necessarily merit worship or prostration, or even recognition to be honest.
>>12813091
One of these things is not like the other. It's the tree motif.